public inbox for linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@jfarr.cc>
To: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com>
Cc: kent.overstreet@linux.dev, kees@kernel.org,
	gustavoars@kernel.org, thorsten.blum@toblux.com,
	linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bcachefs: Annotate struct bch_xattr with __counted_by()"
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 21:09:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBPG0OqCCM6weLMZ@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250501184150.200319-1-mmpgouride@gmail.com>

On 02 02:41:50, Alan Huang wrote:
> This reverts commit 86e92eeeb23741a072fe7532db663250ff2e726a.
> 
> After the x_name, there is a value. According to the disscussion[1],
> __counted_by assumes that the flexible array member contains exactly
> the amount of elements that are specified. Now there are users came across
> buffer overflow caused by the __counted_by here[2], so revert that.

Nit: It's not causing a buffer overflow. It's causing a false positive
detection of an out of bounds write.

> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zv8VDKWN1GzLRT-_@archlinux/T/#m0ce9541c5070146320efd4f928cc1ff8de69e9b2
> [2] https://privatebin.net/?a0d4e97d590d71e1#9bLmp2Kb5NU6X6cZEucchDcu88HzUQwHUah8okKPReEt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/bcachefs/xattr_format.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/xattr_format.h b/fs/bcachefs/xattr_format.h
> index c7916011ef34..e9f810539552 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/xattr_format.h
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/xattr_format.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct bch_xattr {
>  	__u8			x_type;
>  	__u8			x_name_len;
>  	__le16			x_val_len;
> -	__u8			x_name[] __counted_by(x_name_len);
> +	__u8			x_name[];
>  } __packed __aligned(8);
>  
>  #endif /* _BCACHEFS_XATTR_FORMAT_H */
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-01 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-01 18:41 [PATCH] Revert "bcachefs: Annotate struct bch_xattr with __counted_by()" Alan Huang
2025-05-01 19:09 ` Jan Hendrik Farr [this message]
2025-05-01 19:16 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-05-01 19:22   ` Jan Hendrik Farr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBPG0OqCCM6weLMZ@archlinux \
    --to=kernel@jfarr.cc \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmpgouride@gmail.com \
    --cc=thorsten.blum@toblux.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox