From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E0527D780; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755027359; cv=none; b=Xco5tYv0kdIw+AiQE1ucukOzVP8CG8/DP8c9ZLUp/BkFsoxEa//aKfzKN5cAG6Co8BRFncerRpbGUmHYblmY7JaQSm5vHdkoMboVzKqNITdWA3PpQROJRryo0d5pEg4VcwCscQCJPCx2t/aPyw1AQr7eHt48vzMFXUAwcdYlteM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755027359; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oOtLrOFSkCrfHUZ803LY2MKSsmRSCmBmVCEWP5AF4tA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l197fDfnzv1N/uXmDzLGH5A+SS9jsDfhaVcMvpdFonhGCj15TsFHwB5u7YFAsxZTRo9tz2Jkr13m8Zm7zf3kwZzoFGZHq60gFGOSKi/QnzoB6rB4P4X4GupA9GhA6lGqDHo9Sc5T5NgTuzMnS+eu/s5IckPreqaR8N8NL5LcMhI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qaOH/GFU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qaOH/GFU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E085C4CEF0; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:35:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755027358; bh=oOtLrOFSkCrfHUZ803LY2MKSsmRSCmBmVCEWP5AF4tA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qaOH/GFUpVapclspVWFkrtEAzBBo4k4WfCxOEgGwGECC4RNYYckgwLJMO0jXzQYJf 3rEyy/vrJvP+kbogHMdSfpxMtJJV3imM6OmxzpYeUWlUjwUwTaCYiuHaNPa4IMITvT 7ulKmhCUDmQgI0Ono/6kGS/AHc+fbhtp2m1jX0RJ/l6t6VTVY9Vp6IwAB7FLUkpLAp laZb2zGmzLA8ozfxjJDNILFeGXkLda0f9zttGUL3ETxVovY/BEl1SGBSR/1of1O/No 2BpnAPyIgijkNsN+h9EpngYTqsl+gpJELzSJJrS7bKGIEV7uUUFVo2qnIg77JZs5wH BK4N9GLa37kqg== Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 13:35:56 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Kent Overstreet Cc: Konstantin Shelekhin , admin@aquinas.su, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, list-bcachefs@carlthompson.net, malte.schroeder@tnxip.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17 Message-ID: References: <3ik3h6hfm4v2y3rtpjshk5y4wlm5n366overw2lp72qk5izizw@k6vxp22uwnwa> <55e623db-ff03-4d33-98d1-1042106e83c6@ftml.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 10:26:03AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On the other hand, for the only incidences I can remotely refer to in > the past year and a half, there has been: ... > - the block layer developer who went on a four email rant where he, > charitably, misread the spec or the patchset or both; all this over a > patch to simply bring a warning in line with the actual NVME and SCSI > specs. Are you talking about this thread? https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250311201518.3573009-14-kent.overstreet@linux.dev/ I try to closely follow those lists, and that's the only thread I recall that even slightly rings a bell from your description, however it's not an accurate description (you were the one who misread the specs there; I tried to help bridge the gap). I recall the interaction was pretty tame though, so maybe you're talking about something else. Perhaps a link for context if I got it wrong?