From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E168C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231177AbiGMXuB (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:50:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57714 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230371AbiGMXuB (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:50:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com (mail-pg1-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73A552DCF for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id h132so4464pgc.10 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:49:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IvPV3oJ9vdJJfCHBYW47RH7lM0GyR4PdZoEoClAuzZ8=; b=LAvAyxp4I4+n8v9SORbIIJ5N22J+7DKCmHWwajz2niYjyMyy18EYjteQv2hGEppho2 ahbtlwpKZHKVfj1e5lUs2l9qTmMVKeLHFs+w/6ftXYLX8HQ0nyMQjJjZbTeogQSh6mFT gauaZ5w50UKDEj2s3wX7Mn6kSKa5ceMTCK8TaCMFkUT5hGdbThQpmkZ5MVEi7o4RnPQ5 acgtuUQJC5vWefRGMdgaHTe16Ji8CZPKGbDM7zv1HvXGjr+M0q5XWr79QFGBGbuIXFQl y+M042pZk2WNyp91dBKvKVXeGdsc6xumfZ36B6apXHDOp9GwwWZdeadC5hPkN8TSv+O/ L2Pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9XH5Gh/RKhQFNgDM1KrS/pGUjyTgDZGQc/i2oAZhpOSiS/E2q/ 1tcnrh32lRoSpq3qrgPMG44Ep8FTT1Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vLzflS9+Q+Xr1E1B4DFWNgPKak2akIdeSxm76cXX+bkulQapC/tRtORsaUByOmq2HjUb2MuA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:7bd7:0:b0:52b:1d57:e098 with SMTP id w206-20020a627bd7000000b0052b1d57e098mr706908pfc.19.1657756199133; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:15c:211:201:cf8d:5409:1ca6:f804? ([2620:15c:211:201:cf8d:5409:1ca6:f804]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id np12-20020a17090b4c4c00b001ecbd9aa1a7sm69347pjb.1.2022.07.13.16.49.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0496421c-5793-40c4-4662-865fc19bbbdc@acm.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:49:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/63] Improve static type checking for request flags Content-Language: en-US To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig References: <20220629233145.2779494-1-bvanassche@acm.org> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 7/13/22 16:46, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 7/13/22 3:48 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> I think that everyone who is interested in reviewing this patch series >> has had sufficient time to review the patches in this patch series. Do >> you prefer to queue this patch series for kernel v5.20 or kernel >> v5.21? > > I've been pondering the same. I'm fine with going for 5.20 as this will > be a pain to maintain, but the first patch doesn't even apply to my > for-5.20/block branch... Hi Jens, This patch series was prepared against your for-next branch. I will rebase it on top of your for-5.20/block branch, retest and repost it. Thanks, Bart.