From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ublk: remove io_cmds list in ublk_queue
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:48:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <097f0495-b2e8-4938-9a0d-c321f618d49b@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9m+3qMBXgqDz399@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com>
On 3/18/25 12:43 PM, Uday Shankar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:22:57PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> struct ublk_rq_data {
>>> - struct llist_node node;
>>> -
>>> struct kref ref;
>>> };
>>
>> Can we get rid of ublk_rq_data then? If it's just a ref thing, I'm sure
>> we can find an atomic_t of space in struct request and avoid it. Not a
>> pressing thing, just tossing it out there...
>
> Yeah probably - we do need a ref since one could complete a request
> concurrently with another code path which references it (user copy and
> zero copy). I see that struct request has a refcount in it already,
Right, at least with the current usage, we still do need that kref, or
something similar. I would've probably made it just use refcount_t
though, rather than rely on the indirect calls. kref doesn't really
bring us anything here in terms of API.
> though I don't see any examples of drivers using it. Would it be a bad
> idea to try and reuse that?
We can't reuse that one, and it's not for driver use - purely internal.
But I _think_ you could easily grab space in the union that has the hash
and ipi_list for it. And then you could dump needing this extra data per
request.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 18:14 [PATCH] ublk: remove io_cmds list in ublk_queue Uday Shankar
2025-03-18 18:22 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-18 18:43 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-18 18:48 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-03-18 21:58 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-19 1:54 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-19 1:04 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-19 1:57 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-19 2:14 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-19 12:32 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=097f0495-b2e8-4938-9a0d-c321f618d49b@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox