From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 04/24] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 20:31:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a09d08d-b400-4111-b2b6-b0a70b5bbd71@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260116141859.719929-5-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Claude says:
This commit implements handling of UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS for batch I/O
preparation. It adds a per-io spinlock and walks the uring_cmd buffer to
prepare each I/O element.
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 9fd81213b81b..6aef1a856a80 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
[ ... ]
> +static int ublk_batch_prep_io(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> + const struct ublk_batch_io_data *data,
> + const struct ublk_elem_header *elem)
> +{
> + struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[elem->tag];
> + const struct ublk_batch_io *uc = &data->header;
> + union ublk_io_buf buf = { 0 };
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (ublk_dev_support_auto_buf_reg(data->ub))
> + buf.auto_reg = ublk_batch_auto_buf_reg(uc, elem);
> + else if (ublk_dev_need_map_io(data->ub)) {
> + buf.addr = ublk_batch_buf_addr(uc, elem);
> +
> + ret = ublk_check_fetch_buf(data->ub, buf.addr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ublk_io_lock(io);
> + ret = __ublk_fetch(data->cmd, data->ub, io);
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Can this cause a sleeping-while-atomic bug? The call chain is:
ublk_batch_prep_io()
-> ublk_io_lock(io) // acquires spinlock
-> __ublk_fetch()
-> ublk_mark_io_ready()
-> ublk_reset_io_flags()
-> mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex) // sleeps
When preparing the last I/O that makes the device ready (nr_io_ready ==
total), ublk_mark_io_ready() calls ublk_reset_io_flags() which tries to
acquire ub->cancel_mutex. This is a sleeping operation but io->lock
spinlock is held.
The existing ublk_fetch() avoids this by NOT holding the spinlock when
calling __ublk_fetch() - it only holds ub->mutex. Should ublk_batch_prep_io()
move the __ublk_fetch() call outside the spinlock-protected section?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-16 14:18 [PATCH V6 00/24] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 01/24] ublk: define ublk_ch_batch_io_fops for the coming feature F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 02/24] ublk: prepare for not tracking task context for command batch Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 03/24] ublk: add new batch command UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS & UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 04/24] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2026-01-23 3:31 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 05/24] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 06/24] ublk: add io events fifo structure Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 07/24] ublk: add batch I/O dispatch infrastructure Ming Lei
2026-01-23 3:32 ` Jens Axboe
2026-01-23 8:10 ` Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 08/24] ublk: add UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS for batch I/O processing Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 09/24] ublk: refactor ublk_queue_rq() and add ublk_batch_queue_rq() Ming Lei
2026-01-23 3:04 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 10/24] ublk: abort requests filled in event kfifo Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 11/24] ublk: add new feature UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 12/24] ublk: document " Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 13/24] ublk: implement batch request completion via blk_mq_end_request_batch() Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 14/24] ublk: fix batch I/O recovery -ENODEV error Ming Lei
2026-01-23 3:33 ` Jens Axboe
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 15/24] selftests: ublk: fix user_data truncation for tgt_data >= 256 Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 16/24] selftests: ublk: replace assert() with ublk_assert() Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 17/24] selftests: ublk: add ublk_io_buf_idx() for returning io buffer index Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 18/24] selftests: ublk: add batch buffer management infrastructure Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 19/24] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 20/24] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 21/24] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 22/24] selftests: ublk: increase timeout to 150 seconds Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 23/24] selftests: ublk: add --batch/-b for enabling F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2026-01-16 14:18 ` [PATCH V6 24/24] selftests: ublk: support arbitrary threads/queues combination Ming Lei
2026-01-23 2:24 ` [PATCH V6 00/24] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2026-01-23 3:06 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a09d08d-b400-4111-b2b6-b0a70b5bbd71@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox