From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix direct dispatch issue failure for clones
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:04:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d754fbb-9034-e375-a71d-9262ce8300ea@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adab29e7-6f9e-0804-5630-73e92be6a990@kernel.dk>
On 12/7/18 6:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> After the direct dispatch corruption fix, we permanently disallow direct
> dispatch of non read/write requests. This works fine off the normal IO
> path, as they will be retried like any other failed direct dispatch
> request. But for the blk_insert_cloned_request() that only DM uses to
> bypass the bottom level scheduler, we always first attempt direct
> dispatch. For some types of requests, that's now a permanent failure,
> and no amount of retrying will make that succeed.
>
> Don't use direct dispatch off the cloned insert path, always just use
> bypass inserts. This still bypasses the bottom level scheduler, which is
> what DM wants.
>
> Fixes: ffe81d45322c ("blk-mq: fix corruption with direct issue")
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index deb56932f8c4..4c44e6fa0d08 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -2637,7 +2637,8 @@ blk_status_t blk_insert_cloned_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *
> * bypass a potential scheduler on the bottom device for
> * insert.
> */
> - return blk_mq_request_issue_directly(rq);
> + blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, true);
> + return BLK_STS_OK;
> }
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
>
Not sure about this because it will break the merging promotion for request based DM
from Ming.
396eaf21ee17c476e8f66249fb1f4a39003d0ab4
(blk-mq: improve DM's blk-mq IO merging via blk_insert_cloned_request feedback)
We could use some other way to fix this.
Thanks
Jianchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-07 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-06 22:20 [PATCH] block: fix direct dispatch issue failure for clones Jens Axboe
2018-12-06 22:21 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-06 22:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-06 22:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-12-06 22:32 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-07 1:04 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-12-07 1:13 ` [PATCH] " Jens Axboe
2018-12-07 1:22 ` jianchao.wang
2018-12-07 1:34 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-07 1:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-12-07 2:06 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-07 2:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-07 2:28 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-07 2:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-12-07 2:05 ` [PATCH] " jianchao.wang
2018-12-07 1:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-12-07 1:20 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d754fbb-9034-e375-a71d-9262ce8300ea@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).