From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
john.garry@huawei.com, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC v2 4/8] blk-mq: don't preempt tag under heavy load
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 07:24:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dab5bd2-4f19-0b04-fa8c-6ed68b70c20e@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220408073916.1428590-5-yukuai3@huawei.com>
On 4/8/22 00:39, Yu Kuai wrote:
> The idle way to disable tag preemption is to track how many tags are
idle -> ideal?
> available, and wait directly in blk_mq_get_tag() if free tags are
> very little. However, this is out of reality because fast path is
> affected.
>
> As 'ws_active' is only updated in slow path, this patch disable tag
> preemption if 'ws_active' is greater than 8, which means there are many
> threads waiting for tags already.
>
> Once tag preemption is disabled, there is a situation that can cause
> performance degration(or io hung in extreme scenarios): the waitqueue
degration -> degradation?
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
> index 2615bd58bad3..b49b20e11350 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ struct blk_mq_alloc_data {
>
> /* allocate multiple requests/tags in one go */
> unsigned int nr_tags;
> + bool preemption;
> struct request **cached_rq;
>
Please change "preemption" into "preempt".
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-08 7:39 [PATCH -next RFC v2 0/8] improve tag allocation under heavy load Yu Kuai
2022-04-08 7:39 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 1/8] sbitmap: record the number of waiters for each waitqueue Yu Kuai
2022-04-08 7:39 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 2/8] blk-mq: call 'bt_wait_ptr()' later in blk_mq_get_tag() Yu Kuai
2022-04-08 14:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-09 2:09 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-08 7:39 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 3/8] sbitmap: make sure waitqueues are balanced Yu Kuai
2022-04-15 6:31 ` Li, Ming
2022-04-15 7:07 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-08 7:39 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 4/8] blk-mq: don't preempt tag under heavy load Yu Kuai
2022-04-08 14:24 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-04-09 2:38 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-08 7:39 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 5/8] sbitmap: force tag preemption if free tags are sufficient Yu Kuai
2022-04-08 7:39 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 6/8] blk-mq: force tag preemption for split bios Yu Kuai
2022-04-08 7:39 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 7/8] blk-mq: record how many tags are needed for splited bio Yu Kuai
2022-04-08 7:39 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 8/8] sbitmap: wake up the number of threads based on required tags Yu Kuai
2022-04-08 14:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-09 2:19 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-08 21:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-09 2:17 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-09 4:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-09 7:01 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-12 3:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-08 19:10 ` [PATCH -next RFC v2 0/8] improve tag allocation under heavy load Jens Axboe
2022-04-09 2:26 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-09 2:28 ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-09 2:34 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-09 7:14 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-09 21:31 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0dab5bd2-4f19-0b04-fa8c-6ed68b70c20e@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).