From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com" <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: add nvme pci timeout testcase
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 23:51:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e02391c-c3cd-48db-8ac9-6e21cf617107@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d921a213-df5d-45dd-bc37-99f3034a1a03@kernel.dk>
On 1/10/2024 6:59 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/10/24 1:12 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Should this be TEST_DEV instead ?
>>>>
>>>> why ?
>>>>
>>> My understanding of blktests is, add device which we want to test in
>>> config files under TEST_DEV (except null-blk and nvme-fabrics loopback
>>> devices, which are usually populated inside the tests).
>>> In this case, if someone do not want to disturb nvme0n1 device,
>>> this test doesn't allow it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nitesh Shetty
>>>
>>
>> it is clearly stated in the documentation that blktests are destructive
>> to the entire system and including any devices you have, if your
>> system has sensitive data then _don't run these tests_ simple, when
>> you are running blktests you are bound to disturb system you can't
>> prevent that by using TEST_DEV.
>
> It should very much be possible to run blktests on specific devices
> ONLY, the intent of a test suite is not to potentially mess up
> everything around you. It should ONLY operate on the devices given, not
> poke at random devices in the system.
>
I'll make the TEST_DEV change ..
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-10 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20240110062350epcas5p351f5b4f8e27b3c57545b49509d2a48b6@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-01-10 3:57 ` [PATCH] nvme: add nvme pci timeout testcase Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-01-10 6:17 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-01-10 7:40 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-01-10 7:54 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-01-10 8:12 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-01-10 9:13 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-01-10 9:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-10 23:47 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-01-10 14:59 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-10 23:51 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2024-01-10 12:23 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-01-11 0:00 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-01-11 4:41 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-01-11 5:01 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-01-11 1:25 ` Yi Zhang
2024-01-11 3:09 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e02391c-c3cd-48db-8ac9-6e21cf617107@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox