Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc5 (block)

Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc5 (block)

[Veronika Kabatova]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
> To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 8:27:49 PM
> Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc5 (block)
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> 
>        Kernel repo:
>        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
>             Commit: cd8ae268840e - Merge branch 'for-5.11/block' into
>             for-next
> 
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> 
>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>              Merge: OK
>            Compile: FAILED
> 
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> 
>   https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/11/30/618887
> 
> We attempted to compile the kernel for multiple architectures, but the
> compile
> failed on one or more architectures:
> 
>            aarch64: FAILED (see build-aarch64.log.xz attachment)
>            ppc64le: FAILED (see build-ppc64le.log.xz attachment)
>              s390x: FAILED (see build-s390x.log.xz attachment)
>             x86_64: FAILED (see build-x86_64.log.xz attachment)
> 

Hi,

looks to be introduced by

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=1076736138841d8516555f352ae0426a99ae9f92


Veronika

> We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
> detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this
> message.
> 
> Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
> ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more
> effective.
> 
>         ,-.   ,-.
>        ( C ) ( K )  Continuous
>         `-',-.`-'   Kernel
>           ( I )     Integration
>            `-'
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Compile testing
> ---------------
> 
> We compiled the kernel for 4 architectures:
> 
>     aarch64:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     ppc64le:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     s390x:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     x86_64:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
> 
> 

Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc5 (block)

[Jens Axboe]

On 11/30/20 12:29 PM, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
>> To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
>> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 8:27:49 PM
>> Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc5 (block)
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>>
>>        Kernel repo:
>>        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
>>             Commit: cd8ae268840e - Merge branch 'for-5.11/block' into
>>             for-next
>>
>> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>>
>>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>>              Merge: OK
>>            Compile: FAILED
>>
>> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>>
>>   https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/11/30/618887
>>
>> We attempted to compile the kernel for multiple architectures, but the
>> compile
>> failed on one or more architectures:
>>
>>            aarch64: FAILED (see build-aarch64.log.xz attachment)
>>            ppc64le: FAILED (see build-ppc64le.log.xz attachment)
>>              s390x: FAILED (see build-s390x.log.xz attachment)
>>             x86_64: FAILED (see build-x86_64.log.xz attachment)
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> looks to be introduced by
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=1076736138841d8516555f352ae0426a99ae9f92

I also ran into this:

block/genhd.c: In function ‘part_fail_show’:
block/genhd.c:1250:48: error: ‘struct block_device’ has no member named ‘make_it_fail’; did you mean ‘bd_make_it_fail’?
 1250 |  return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", dev_to_bdev(dev)->make_it_fail);
      |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                bd_make_it_fail
block/genhd.c: In function ‘part_fail_store’:
block/genhd.c:1261:4: error: ‘struct block_device’ has no member named ‘pdev’
 1261 |   p->pdev->bd_make_it_fail = (i == 0) ? 0 : 1;
      |    ^~
block/genhd.c: In function ‘part_fail_show’:
block/genhd.c:1251:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
 1251 | }
      | ^

Christoph, I've dropped this series.

-- 
Jens Axboe