Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Kyle Bader <kbader@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kyle Bader <kbader@ibm.com>, Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>,
	Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Tushar Gohad <tushar.gohad@intel.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: only fail dma-buf bios that need block layer PI
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 11:51:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <134aa376-7441-46e1-8d04-be327747b4a9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028181412.1919506-1-kbader@redhat.com>

On 10/28/26 18:14, Kyle Bader wrote:
> From: Kyle Bader <kbader@ibm.com>
> 
> Any dma-buf I/O to a device with a PI checksum fails today.
> blkdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx() returns -EOPNOTSUPP at registration, and
> blk_mq_submit_bio() fails each dma-buf bio with BLK_STS_NOTSUPP. The
> checks prevent a crash: bi_dmabuf_map shares a union with bi_io_vec,
> and bio_integrity_generate() and bio_integrity_verify() walk bi_io_vec
> to compute the guards over the data.
> 
> Only the BI_ACT_CHECK action walks the data, and a dma-buf bio does not
> need it in two cases. In the first case, the submitter attaches its own
> integrity payload, for example with the io_uring PI attribute
> (IORING_RW_ATTR_FLAG_PI). Then bio_integrity_action() returns 0, and
> the device checks the PI as the submitter asked. The block layer only
> touches the integrity buffer, to remap the ref tags. In the second
> case, read_verify or write_generate is off. Then the device inserts and
> strips the PI, or the block layer allocates an integrity buffer without
> PI in it. This is the same as for any other bio.
> 
> The first case lets an application read data into device memory, for
> example a GPU buffer or an NVMe CMB. The device checks each block and
> puts the guards in host memory. The application can then check the
> data, or combine the guards into a checksum of the whole buffer. The
> CPU does not read the data.
> 
> If bio_integrity_action() asks for BI_ACT_CHECK, fail the dma-buf bio,
> and otherwise let it through. Remove the check at registration, because
> the integrity payload comes with each I/O. With the default integrity
> settings, a dma-buf I/O without an integrity payload still fails with
> -EOPNOTSUPP.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/bbb87d6b-b7a3-487a-8be4-27f3f9ce4a1b@samsung.com/
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Bader <kbader@ibm.com>
> ---
> This applies to for-7.4/io_uring-dmabuf (45b716456dd9).
> 
> Anuj's check in v10 fixed the crash in blk_integrity_iterate(). This
> patch keeps that check for the bios that need block layer PI, and lets
> the other dma-buf bios through.
> 
> The sysfs knobs change the integrity flags only with the queue frozen,
> and blk_mq_submit_bio() holds a queue reference from the new check to
> bio_integrity_prep(). So the two calls to bio_integrity_action() give
> the same result for a bio.
> 
> I tested in a QEMU 10.2.2 guest, with udmabuf and with an NVMe CMB
> that a small module exports as a dma-buf. The namespaces have 4 KiB
> blocks with these metadata formats:
> 
>   - 16 bytes, PI type 1 with the 64b guard
>   - 64 bytes, PI type 1 with the 64b guard in the last 16 bytes
>   - 8 bytes, PI type 1 with the 16b guard
>   - no metadata
> 
> With a user PI buffer, reads and writes pass on all three PI formats,
> and the data and the PI match. This is also true for a 2 MiB I/O that
> the block layer splits, and for four commands with one PI slice each.
> A write with one bad guard fails with -EILSEQ from the device. Without
> a PI buffer, a dma-buf I/O fails with -EOPNOTSUPP. If read_verify or
> write_generate is off, that I/O passes. Pavel's rw-dmabuf test from
> liburing rw-dmabuf-tests-v8 passes on the namespace without metadata.
> On the PI namespaces it passes with read_verify=0 and write_generate=0,
> and with the defaults it fails with -EOPNOTSUPP on the first read.
> The tree builds with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY=n.
> 
> Without this patch, every PI case fails at registration with
> -EOPNOTSUPP, also with read_verify and write_generate off.

Thanks, looks good from a quick glance, I'll take another look in
a bit. It might be nice to somehow support kernel generated PI
as well later, looks like there will be a good bunch of cases that
might want to have CPU access.

> If a liburing test helps, I can turn the test program into one.
> 
>   block/blk-mq.c | 9 ++++++++-
>   block/fops.c   | 2 --
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 7fff1305b..3fc9fdeb3 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3138,8 +3138,15 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>   		goto queue_exit;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * The block layer cannot generate or verify PI for a dma-buf bio, as
> +	 * that walks the data pages.  Only fail the bio if it needs that, not
> +	 * if the submitter attached its own integrity payload or if PI
> +	 * generation or verification is turned off for the device.
> +	 */
>   	if (unlikely(op_is_dmabuf(bio->bi_opf) &&
> -		     bdev_has_integrity_csum(bio->bi_bdev))) {
> +		     bdev_has_integrity_csum(bio->bi_bdev) &&
> +		     (bio_integrity_action(bio) & BI_ACT_CHECK))) {
>   		bio_endio_status(bio, BLK_STS_NOTSUPP);
>   		goto queue_exit;
>   	}
> diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
> index 01bc8afe3..5c8024011 100644
> --- a/block/fops.c
> +++ b/block/fops.c
> @@ -947,8 +947,6 @@ static int blkdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx(struct file *file,
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	if (!disk->fops->init_dma_buf_io_ctx)
>   		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -	if (bdev_has_integrity_csum(bdev))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>   	return disk->fops->init_dma_buf_io_ctx(bdev, ctx);
>   }
>   
> 
> base-commit: 45b716456dd99488a0cef58482120dc0474aa696

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28 18:14 [PATCH] block: only fail dma-buf bios that need block layer PI Kyle Bader
2026-10-29 11:33 ` Anuj gupta
2026-10-29 11:51 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2026-10-29 12:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 12:20 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=134aa376-7441-46e1-8d04-be327747b4a9@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbader@ibm.com \
    --cc=kbader@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=tushar.gohad@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox