From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@huawei.com>, Guiyao <guiyao@huawei.com>,
zhangsaisai <zhangsaisai@huawei.com>,
"wubo (T)" <wubo40@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] brd: check and limit max_part par
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:44:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378f7d0-7166-a860-03cd-523cef8ea14b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120225858.GB19571@ming.t460p>
On 2020/1/21 6:58, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 09:14:50PM +0800, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
>>>> +static inline void brd_check_and_reset_par(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if (unlikely(!rd_nr))
>>>> + rd_nr = 1;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (unlikely(!max_part))
>>>> + max_part = 1;
>>>
>>> Another limit is that 'max_part' needs to be divided exactly by (1U <<
>>> MINORBITS), something like:
>>>
>>> max_part = 1UL << fls(max_part)
>>
>> Do we have to limit that 'max_part' needs to be divided exactly by (1U <<
>>> MINORBITS)? As your suggestion, the i * max_part is larger than MINORMASK,
>> we can allocate from extended devt.
>
> Exact dividing is for reserving same minors for all disks with
> RAMDISK_MAJOR, otherwise there is still chance to get same dev_t when
> adding partitions.
>
> Extended devt is for covering more disks, not related with 'max_part'.
>
Thank you very much.
I will change that as you said.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-14 11:56 [PATCH V3] brd: check and limit max_part par Zhiqiang Liu
2020-01-15 2:27 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-20 13:14 ` Zhiqiang Liu
2020-01-20 22:58 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-21 1:44 ` Zhiqiang Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378f7d0-7166-a860-03cd-523cef8ea14b@huawei.com \
--to=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=guiyao@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mingfangsen@huawei.com \
--cc=wubo40@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangsaisai@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox