Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wb-buf-throttle feedback
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 15:25:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473587720.8183.5.camel@researchut.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09938f88-2a74-cb95-4498-5fc883eba115@kernel.dk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hello Jens,


On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 14:19 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > What drive is hosting the system and kernel build? I think the current
> > branch isn't aggressive enough on SATA style QD=32 devices with write
> > back caching, so if that's what you are running, it'd be great if you
> > could try a patch or two so we can improve this situation for you.
> >
> > The v4.7 branch is outdated. Let me spin a new one, that's probably the
> > best way to start.
> 

The drive is:

Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133
SControl 300)
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: ata1.00: ATA-9: HGST HTS725050A7E630, GH2OA910,
max UDMA/133
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: ata1.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ
(depth 31/32), AA
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      HGST
HTS725050A7 A910 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte logical
blocks: (500 GB/466 GiB)
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 4096-byte physical blocks
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read
cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: usb 1-4: new full-speed USB device number 2
using xhci_hcd
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel:  sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 >
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk


> The 4.7 branch has now been updated, it's fully uptodate with the
> current 4.8 based branch. Would be great if you could try that. If you
> still see slowdowns, try and change RWB_DEF_DEPTH. It's currently at 16,
> scale it down to 4 or something like that.


I pulled in your changes from the axboe/wb-buf-throttle-v4.7 branch.

I can confirm now that, with these changes, the machine is very well responsive.
I tried both, the kernel build and the dd tests. Both of them worked fine.

Thank you very much.

Ritesh

- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mW9B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

      reply	other threads:[~2016-09-11  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09 19:00 wb-buf-throttle feedback Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2016-09-09 20:02 ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-09 20:19   ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-11  9:55     ` Ritesh Raj Sarraf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1473587720.8183.5.camel@researchut.com \
    --to=rrs@researchut.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox