From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Bart Van Assche To: "paolo.valente@linaro.org" CC: "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" , "tj@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "axboe@kernel.dk" Subject: Re: [WIP PATCHSET 0/4] WIP branch for bfq-mq Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:44:55 +0000 Message-ID: <1487961857.2575.8.camel@sandisk.com> References: <20170207172446.4528-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <1486745110.2840.3.camel@sandisk.com> <1241B224-A446-4C76-87BB-4EA63852B6D1@linaro.org> <4a893c20-5a6b-a16c-073a-57c1a3d91b5a@sandisk.com> <55E6D3EE-27D1-4D46-ABE5-750445FB941B@linaro.org> <1A8DF6A8-C251-472A-9CE1-ACB1BCD0E9AB@linaro.org> <1487023626.2719.9.camel@sandisk.com> <1487025524.2719.11.camel@sandisk.com> <62F8F65E-A376-44EB-B53C-C2CFB8F8693F@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <62F8F65E-A376-44EB-B53C-C2CFB8F8693F@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com List-ID: On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:29 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: > thanks for this second attempt of yours. Although, unfortunately, not > providing some clear indication of the exact cause of your hang (apart > from a possible deadlock), your log helped me notice another bug. >=20 > At any rate, as I have just written to Jens, I have pushed a new > version of the branch [1] (not just added new commits, but also > integrated some old commit with new changes, to make it more quickly). > The branch now contains both a fix for the above bug, and, more > importantly, a fix for the circular dependencies that were still > lurking around. Could you please test it? Hello Paolo, I have good news: the same test system boots normally with the same kernel config I used during my previous tests and with the latest bfq-mq code (commit a965d19585c0) merged with kernel v4.10. Thanks, Bart.=