public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 17:59:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495735177.2615.3.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdfae246-d65e-fc49-69ec-dffe63832605@fb.com>

On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 11:42 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Why not make it
>=20
> 	/* Must be the last member - see also blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(). */
> 	struct srcu_struct	queue_rq_srcu[0];
>=20
> and fixup blk_mq_hw_ctx_size()
>=20
> static int blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(struct request_queue *q)
> {
> 	int size =3D sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx);
>=20
> 	if (q->tag_set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
> 		size +=3D sizeof(struct srcu_struct);
>=20
> 	return size;
> }
>=20
> I think that'd be cleaner. Keep the end-of-struct checking, just to be
> on the safe side.
>=20
> Neither one is super pretty though, and still doesn't fix the fact that
> the srcu_struct is _half_ the blk_mq_hw_ctx in total.

Hello Jens,

Making these changes seems like a good idea to me. I will make these change=
s
and post a patch.

Bart.=

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-25 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-25  4:21 [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_unquiesce_queue Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: introduce flag of QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm: use the introduced blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] nvme: " Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi: " Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: quiesce queue via percpu_ref Ming Lei
2017-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: update comments on blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Ming Lei
2017-05-25  5:24 ` [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing Bart Van Assche
2017-05-25  9:09   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-25 17:24     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-25 17:31       ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-25 17:42       ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-25 17:59         ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-05-26  0:44         ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495735177.2615.3.camel@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox