From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:00:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501542023.2466.22.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170731165111.11536-3-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 00:50 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> When hw queue is busy, we shouldn't take requests from
> scheduler queue any more, otherwise IO merge will be
> difficult to do.
>=20
> This patch fixes the awful IO performance on some
> SCSI devices(lpfc, qla2xxx, ...) when mq-deadline/kyber
> is used by not taking requests if hw queue is busy.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index 4ab69435708c..47a25333a136 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ct=
x *hctx)
> struct request_queue *q =3D hctx->queue;
> struct elevator_queue *e =3D q->elevator;
> const bool has_sched_dispatch =3D e && e->type->ops.mq.dispatch_request=
;
> - bool did_work =3D false;
> + bool can_go =3D true;
> LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
> =20
> /* RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag */
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_=
ctx *hctx)
> */
> if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
> blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
> - did_work =3D blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
> + can_go =3D blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
> } else if (!has_sched_dispatch) {
> blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
> blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_=
ctx *hctx)
> * on the dispatch list, OR if we did have work but weren't able
> * to make progress.
> */
> - if (!did_work && has_sched_dispatch) {
> + if (can_go && has_sched_dispatch) {
> do {
> struct request *rq;
Hello Ming,
Please chose a better name for the new variable, e.g. "do_sched_dispatch".=
=20
Otherwise this patch looks fine to me. Hence:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Bart.=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-31 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-31 16:50 [PATCH 00/14] blk-mq-sched: fix SCSI-MQ performance regression Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:50 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 01/14] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance Ming Lei
2017-07-31 23:00 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-07-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 02/14] blk-mq: rename flush_busy_ctx_data as ctx_iter_data Ming Lei
2017-07-31 23:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 03/14] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_dispatch_rq_from_ctxs() Ming Lei
2017-07-31 23:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-01 10:07 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-02 17:19 ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 04/14] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-07-31 23:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-01 10:17 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-01 10:50 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-01 15:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-02 3:31 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-03 1:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-03 3:13 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-03 17:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-05 8:40 ` hch
2017-08-05 13:40 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 05/14] blk-mq-sched: don't dequeue request until all in ->dispatch are flushed Ming Lei
2017-07-31 23:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-01 10:44 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-01 16:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-02 3:01 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-03 1:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 06/14] blk-mq-sched: introduce blk_mq_sched_queue_depth() Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 07/14] blk-mq-sched: use q->queue_depth as hint for q->nr_requests Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 08/14] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_SHARED_DEPTH Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 09/14] blk-mq-sched: cleanup blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 10/14] blk-mq-sched: introduce helpers for query, change busy state Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 11/14] blk-mq: introduce helpers for operating ->dispatch list Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 12/14] blk-mq: introduce pointers to dispatch lock & list Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 13/14] blk-mq: pass 'request_queue *' to several helpers of operating BUSY Ming Lei
2017-07-31 16:51 ` [PATCH 14/14] blk-mq-sched: improve IO scheduling on SCSI devcie Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501542023.2466.22.camel@wdc.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox