From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: usercopy whitelist woe in scsi_sense_cache From: James Bottomley To: Kees Cook , Oleksandr Natalenko , Jens Axboe , Bart Van Assche , Paolo Valente Cc: David Windsor , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , Johannes Thumshirn , linux-block@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:02:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <10360653.ov98egbaqx@natalenko.name> <2864697.7uzmEJovl2@natalenko.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1523959328.3250.11.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-ID: On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 20:12 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > I still haven't figured this out, though... any have a moment to look > at this? Just to let you know you're not alone ... but I can't make any sense of this either. The bfdq is the elevator_data, which is initialised when the scheduler is attached, so it shouldn't change. Is it possible to set a data break point on elevator_data after it's initialised and see if it got changed by something? James