From: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>,
Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "blk-mq: remove code for dealing with remapping queue"
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:56:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524603394.6117.1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180424200144.16179-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 04:01 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This reverts commit 37c7c6c76d431dd7ef9c29d95f6052bd425f004c.
>
> Turns out some drivers(most are FC drivers) may not use managed
> IRQ affinity, and has their customized .map_queues meantime, so
> still keep this code for avoiding regression.
>
> Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index e39276852638..f4891b792d0d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2407,7 +2407,7 @@ static void blk_mq_free_map_and_requests(struct
> blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>
> static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
> {
> - unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int i, hctx_idx;
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
> struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
> @@ -2424,8 +2424,23 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct
> request_queue *q)
>
> /*
> * Map software to hardware queues.
> + *
> + * If the cpu isn't present, the cpu is mapped to first
> hctx.
> */
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> + hctx_idx = q->mq_map[i];
> + /* unmapped hw queue can be remapped after CPU topo
> changed */
> + if (!set->tags[hctx_idx] &&
> + !__blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(set, hctx_idx)) {
> + /*
> + * If tags initialization fail for some
> hctx,
> + * that hctx won't be brought online. In
> this
> + * case, remap the current ctx to hctx[0]
> which
> + * is guaranteed to always have tags
> allocated
> + */
> + q->mq_map[i] = 0;
> + }
> +
> ctx = per_cpu_ptr(q->queue_ctx, i);
> hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q, i);
>
> @@ -2437,8 +2452,21 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct
> request_queue *q)
> mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
>
> queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> - /* every hctx should get mapped by at least one CPU
> */
> - WARN_ON(!hctx->nr_ctx);
> + /*
> + * If no software queues are mapped to this hardware
> queue,
> + * disable it and free the request entries.
> + */
> + if (!hctx->nr_ctx) {
> + /* Never unmap queue 0. We need it as a
> + * fallback in case of a new remap fails
> + * allocation
> + */
> + if (i && set->tags[i])
> + blk_mq_free_map_and_requests(set,
> i);
> +
> + hctx->tags = NULL;
> + continue;
> + }
>
> hctx->tags = set->tags[i];
> WARN_ON(!hctx->tags);
Hello Ming
Thanks for getting this fixed so quickly.
The dumpstack is gone now of course.
Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-24 20:01 [PATCH] Revert "blk-mq: remove code for dealing with remapping queue" Ming Lei
2018-04-24 20:56 ` Laurence Oberman [this message]
2018-04-25 7:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-25 8:38 ` Stefan Haberland
2018-04-25 13:59 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-25 14:02 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-25 15:45 ` Stefan Haberland
2018-04-25 15:49 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524603394.6117.1.camel@redhat.com \
--to=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).