linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com,  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Matias Bjorling <matias.bjorling@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:04:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1540397093.66186.13.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1zhv3e4oe.fsf@oracle.com>

On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 11:37 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Mike,
> 
> > > You keep mentioning this, but I don't recall ever seeing anything to
> > > that effect. The rest of the kernel appears to be either arbitrary
> > > ordering or favoring author SoB as the first tag.
> > 
> > I've always felt the proper order is how Jens likes it too (all dm
> > commits from me follow that order).
> 
> That's fine, I don't have any particular preference. And I don't have
> any issue with you guys sticking to a certain ordering in your
> respective subsystems. I occasionally shuffle tags when I commit things
> in SCSI too.
> 
> I just think it should be properly documented if there is a preferred
> way to order things...

When I tried to look up documentation for this I couldn't find anything under
the Documentation directory. Maybe it's there but I didn't look carefully
enough. All I could find on the web is e-mails from Linus in which he explains
that the order of Signed-off-by's should match the chain of authorship.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-24 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-12 10:08 [PATCH v4 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Rearrange code Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  4:48   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Reduce boot device scan and revalidate time Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  4:50   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Fix sd_zbc_check_zones() error checks Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:23   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-10-12 11:41     ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  4:51   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-17  7:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] block: Introduce blkdev_nr_zones() helper Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] block: Limit allocation of zone descriptors for report zones Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] block: Introduce BLKGETZONESZ ioctl Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] block: Introduce BLKGETNRZONES ioctl Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] block: Improve zone reset execution Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] block: Expose queue nr_zones in sysfs Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] block: add a report_zones method Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  4:55   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16 15:17   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] block: Introduce blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  5:00   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16 15:17   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-13 22:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements Jens Axboe
2018-10-15  0:45   ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  2:34     ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-16  3:43       ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-18  7:57       ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-23 15:59 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-24  2:26   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-24 15:03     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-24 15:37       ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-24 16:04         ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-10-25 14:30           ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-24  8:04   ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1540397093.66186.13.camel@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=matias.bjorling@wdc.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).