* [PATCH 0/2] get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT
@ 2018-12-05 15:36 Weiping Zhang
2018-12-05 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: " Weiping Zhang
2018-12-05 15:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: add BLK_DEF_TIMEOUT Weiping Zhang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Weiping Zhang @ 2018-12-05 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: linux-block
Get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT, since we want use io_timeout to control
the maximun timeouts of a request, so remove this limitation.
Weiping Zhang (2):
block: get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT
block: add BLK_DEF_TIMEOUT
block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
block/blk-timeout.c | 13 +------------
block/blk.h | 5 ++---
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] block: get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT
2018-12-05 15:36 [PATCH 0/2] get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT Weiping Zhang
@ 2018-12-05 15:37 ` Weiping Zhang
2018-12-05 15:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-05 15:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: add BLK_DEF_TIMEOUT Weiping Zhang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Weiping Zhang @ 2018-12-05 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: linux-block
Since io_timeout was added to sysfs, the user can tune timeouts
by that attribute, so kill this limitation.
Signed-off-by: Weiping Zhang <zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>
---
block/blk-timeout.c | 13 +------------
block/blk.h | 4 ----
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-timeout.c b/block/blk-timeout.c
index 124c26128bf6..6b2b0f7e5929 100644
--- a/block/blk-timeout.c
+++ b/block/blk-timeout.c
@@ -89,17 +89,6 @@ void blk_abort_request(struct request *req)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_abort_request);
-unsigned long blk_rq_timeout(unsigned long timeout)
-{
- unsigned long maxt;
-
- maxt = round_jiffies_up(jiffies + BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT);
- if (time_after(timeout, maxt))
- timeout = maxt;
-
- return timeout;
-}
-
/**
* blk_add_timer - Start timeout timer for a single request
* @req: request that is about to start running.
@@ -130,7 +119,7 @@ void blk_add_timer(struct request *req)
* than an existing one, modify the timer. Round up to next nearest
* second.
*/
- expiry = blk_rq_timeout(round_jiffies_up(expiry));
+ expiry = round_jiffies_up(expiry);
if (!timer_pending(&q->timeout) ||
time_before(expiry, q->timeout.expires)) {
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index 848278c52030..f0d0a18fb276 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -7,9 +7,6 @@
#include <xen/xen.h>
#include "blk-mq.h"
-/* Max future timer expiry for timeouts */
-#define BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT (5 * HZ)
-
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
extern struct dentry *blk_debugfs_root;
#endif
@@ -151,7 +148,6 @@ static inline bool bio_integrity_endio(struct bio *bio)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY */
-unsigned long blk_rq_timeout(unsigned long timeout);
void blk_add_timer(struct request *req);
bool bio_attempt_front_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] block: add BLK_DEF_TIMEOUT
2018-12-05 15:36 [PATCH 0/2] get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT Weiping Zhang
2018-12-05 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: " Weiping Zhang
@ 2018-12-05 15:38 ` Weiping Zhang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Weiping Zhang @ 2018-12-05 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: linux-block
Add an obvious definition for default request timeout.
Signed-off-by: Weiping Zhang <zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
block/blk.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 900550594651..53337d5c37af 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2845,7 +2845,7 @@ struct request_queue *blk_mq_init_allocated_queue(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
goto err_hctxs;
INIT_WORK(&q->timeout_work, blk_mq_timeout_work);
- blk_queue_rq_timeout(q, set->timeout ? set->timeout : 30 * HZ);
+ blk_queue_rq_timeout(q, set->timeout ? set->timeout : BLK_DEF_TIMEOUT);
q->tag_set = set;
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index f0d0a18fb276..7905b952b7b3 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
#include <xen/xen.h>
#include "blk-mq.h"
+/* the default request timeout */
+#define BLK_DEF_TIMEOUT (30 * HZ)
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
extern struct dentry *blk_debugfs_root;
#endif
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT
2018-12-05 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: " Weiping Zhang
@ 2018-12-05 15:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-06 14:18 ` Weiping Zhang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2018-12-05 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Weiping Zhang, axboe; +Cc: linux-block
On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 23:37 +0800, Weiping Zhang wrote:
> @@ -130,7 +119,7 @@ void blk_add_timer(struct request *req)
> * than an existing one, modify the timer. Round up to next nearest
> * second.
> */
> - expiry = blk_rq_timeout(round_jiffies_up(expiry));
> + expiry = round_jiffies_up(expiry);
If you would have read the comment above this code, you would have known
that this patch does not do what you think it does and additionally that
it introduces a regression.
Bart.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT
2018-12-05 15:58 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2018-12-06 14:18 ` Weiping Zhang
2018-12-06 16:14 ` Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Weiping Zhang @ 2018-12-06 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bvanassche; +Cc: zhangweiping, Jens Axboe, linux-block
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> 于2018年12月5日周三 下午11:59写道:
>
> On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 23:37 +0800, Weiping Zhang wrote:
> > @@ -130,7 +119,7 @@ void blk_add_timer(struct request *req)
> > * than an existing one, modify the timer. Round up to next nearest
> > * second.
> > */
> > - expiry = blk_rq_timeout(round_jiffies_up(expiry));
> > + expiry = round_jiffies_up(expiry);
>
> If you would have read the comment above this code, you would have known
> that this patch does not do what you think it does and additionally that
> it introduces a regression.
>
Let's paste full comments here:
/*
* If the timer isn't already pending or this timeout is earlier
* than an existing one, modify the timer. Round up to next nearest
* second.
*/
Before this patch, even we set io_timeout to 30*HZ(default), but
blk_rq_timeout always return jiffies +5*HZ,
[1]. if there no pending request in timeout list, the timer callback
blk_rq_timed_out_timer will be called after 5*HZ, and then
blk_mq_check_expired will check is there exist some request
was delayed by compare jiffies and request->deadline, obvious
request is not timeout because we set request's timeouts is 30*HZ.
So for this case timer callback should be called at jiffies + 30 instead
of jiffies + 5*HZ.
[2]. if there are pending request in timeout list, we compare request's
expiry and queue's expiry. If time_after(request->expire, queue->expire) modify
queue->timeout.expire to request->expire, otherwise do nothing.
So I think this patch just solve problem in [1], no other regression, or what's
I missing here ?
Thanks
Weiping
> Bart.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT
2018-12-06 14:18 ` Weiping Zhang
@ 2018-12-06 16:14 ` Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2018-12-06 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Weiping Zhang; +Cc: zhangweiping, Jens Axboe, linux-block
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 22:18 +0800, Weiping Zhang wrote:
> Before this patch, even we set io_timeout to 30*HZ(default), but
> blk_rq_timeout always return jiffies +5*HZ,
> [1]. if there no pending request in timeout list, the timer callback
> blk_rq_timed_out_timer will be called after 5*HZ, and then
> blk_mq_check_expired will check is there exist some request
> was delayed by compare jiffies and request->deadline, obvious
> request is not timeout because we set request's timeouts is 30*HZ.
> So for this case timer callback should be called at jiffies + 30 instead
> of jiffies + 5*HZ.
>
> [2]. if there are pending request in timeout list, we compare request's
> expiry and queue's expiry. If time_after(request->expire, queue->expire) modify
> queue->timeout.expire to request->expire, otherwise do nothing.
>
> So I think this patch just solve problem in [1], no other regression, or what's
> I missing here ?
The blk_rq_timeout() function was introduced by commit 0d2602ca30e4 ("blk-mq:
improve support for shared tags maps"). I think the purpose of that function
is to make sure that the nr_active counter in struct blk_mq_hw_ctx gets updated
at least once every five seconds. So there are two problems with this patch:
- It reduces the frequency of 'nr_active' updates. I think that is wrong and
also that it will negatively affect drivers that rely on this functionality,
e.g. the SCSI core.
- The patch description does not match the code changes in this patch.
Bart.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-06 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-05 15:36 [PATCH 0/2] get rid of BLK_MAX_TIMEOUT Weiping Zhang
2018-12-05 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: " Weiping Zhang
2018-12-05 15:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-06 14:18 ` Weiping Zhang
2018-12-06 16:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-05 15:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: add BLK_DEF_TIMEOUT Weiping Zhang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).