From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF8CC04EB8 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6941120878 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:02:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6941120878 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725901AbeLFSCE (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:02:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:43532 "EHLO mail-pg1-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725889AbeLFSCD (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:02:03 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id v28so471820pgk.10 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 10:02:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vuPoCWxHnkqp3gAyy+muhBVDStWdCEwdR529shXOJoo=; b=Ha98lUnFOPUWbRqFEyS5d5ZgAzIEuH3ufpWOiDVImcRjrBN3XzM2L5GZnQUng7Aq9J ih9ZzEod46chtL8ps71DD8Q+K6umkGUQutlOI1xz1luw58GaU66wDa5ErzYFQlC85j9y UmUAAhAfFiox6P4dMtpUPGkJA2BO6cqenReJq+sYvnkSIkHbGJgPnB89cpYzqOQAJxNT TGq/LJGxFkqsXN7uFcHSbtR12PKftyGSjx1o532qfU63zEsfGW6kOyaEQq4xlQIrM86R LtCIOdxVt0PgsdEldj1IpGjdpE9Efsiw/TZ5ECFSWpbLn7dG4FqSeav6JX839+dI/lXm 6S3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYO1hxNu23EL44okkQwA/K9RKjBt5OG9EAgLqrUAXaWj78N1Ryh 5hCvxR9J/Z/VbREfhu1MRJU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Wmx9K7aSCstRlEUcx3mMaI2rXdajJTwrYbPDbM+OsAHeYFPHXiZSe5R7ImkllQ8gb6pq0SNw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:81d0:: with SMTP id c16mr29170553pfn.153.1544119322940; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 10:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:15c:2cd:203:5cdc:422c:7b28:ebb5? ([2620:15c:2cd:203:5cdc:422c:7b28:ebb5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g15sm4952703pfj.131.2018.12.06.10.02.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 10:02:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1544119321.185366.277.camel@acm.org> Subject: Re: for-next branch and blktests/srp From: Bart Van Assche To: Jens Axboe Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , Mike Snitzer Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 10:02:01 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1544114872.185366.250.camel@acm.org> <41bbac1e-7461-4378-a18d-531b625d6784@kernel.dk> <1544116771.185366.261.camel@acm.org> <707b709c-547f-b330-bd37-29b8fc427827@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-7" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 10:48 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: +AD4 which would result in a non-zero exit, which should be expected for this +AD4 test? Hi Jens, Test srp/002 simulates network failures while running fio on top of dm-mpath. Since queue+AF8-if+AF8-no+AF8-path is enabled in multipath.conf dm-mpath will keep retrying the block layer requests it receives if these requests fail due to path removal. If fio reports +ACI-io+AF8-u error+ACI for this test then that means that the test failed. I haven't seen fio reporting any I/O errors for this test with any upstream kernel that I tested in the past year or so. Bart.