From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: don't call blk_mq_run_hw_queues() for dead or dying queues
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:12:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1553613164.118779.50.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a95b94e1-ee6f-a534-a1f0-d55d6b8bffe0@suse.de>
On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 15:08 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 3/26/19 2:43 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 3/26/19 5:07 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > > When a queue is dying or dead there is no point in calling
> > > blk_mq_run_hw_queues() in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(); in fact, doing
> > > so might crash the machine as the queue structures are in the
> > > process of being deleted.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> > > ---
> > > block/blk-mq.c | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> > > index a9c181603cbd..b1eeba38bc79 100644
> > > --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > > @@ -258,7 +258,8 @@ void blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> > > blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
> > > /* dispatch requests which are inserted during quiescing */
> > > - blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
> > > + if (!blk_queue_dying(q) && !blk_queue_dead(q))
> > > + blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_unquiesce_queue);
> >
> > Hi Hannes,
> >
> > Please provide more context information. In the "dead" state the queue
> > must be run to make sure that all requests that were queued before the
> > "dead" state get processed. The blk_cleanup_queue() function is
> > responsible for stopping all code that can run the queue after all
> > requests have finished and before destruction of the data structures
> > needed for request processing starts.
> >
>
> I have a crash with two processes competing for the same controller:
>
> #0 0xffffffff983d3bcb in sbitmap_any_bit_set (sb=0xffff8a1b874ba0d8)
> at ../lib/sbitmap.c:181
> #1 0xffffffff98366c05 in blk_mq_hctx_has_pending (hctx=0xffff8a1b874ba000)
> at ../block/blk-mq.c:66
> #2 0xffffffff98366c85 in blk_mq_run_hw_queues (q=0xffff8a1b874ba0d8,
> async=true) at ../block/blk-mq.c:1292
> #3 0xffffffff98366d3a in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue (q=<optimized out>)
> at ../block/blk-mq.c:265
> #4 0xffffffffc01f3e0e in nvme_start_queues (ctrl=<optimized out>)
> at ../drivers/nvme/host/core.c:3658
> #5 0xffffffffc01e843c in nvme_fc_delete_association
> (ctrl=0xffff8a1f9be5a000)
> at ../drivers/nvme/host/fc.c:2843
> #6 0xffffffffc01e8544 in nvme_fc_delete_association (ctrl=<optimized out>)
> at ../drivers/nvme/host/fc.c:2918
> #7 0xffffffffc01e8544 in __nvme_fc_terminate_io (ctrl=0xffff8a1f9be5a000)
> at ../drivers/nvme/host/fc.c:2911
> #8 0xffffffffc01e8f09 in nvme_fc_reset_ctrl_work (work=0xffff8a1f9be5a6d0)
> at ../drivers/nvme/host/fc.c:2927
> #9 0xffffffff980a224a in process_one_work (worker=0xffff8a1b73934f00,
> work=0xffff8a1f9be5a6d0) at ../kernel/workqueue.c:2092
> #10 0xffffffff980a249b in worker_thread (__worker=0xffff8a1b73934f00)
> at ../kernel/workqueue.c:2226
>
> #7 0xffffffff986d2e9a in wait_for_completion (x=0xffffa48eca88bc40)
> at ../kernel/sched/completion.c:125
> #8 0xffffffff980f25ae in __synchronize_srcu (sp=0xffffffff9914fc20
> <debugfs_srcu>, do_norm=<optimized out>) at ../kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:851
> #9 0xffffffff982d18b1 in debugfs_remove_recursive (dentry=<optimized out>)
> at ../fs/debugfs/inode.c:741
> #10 0xffffffff98398ac5 in blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctx
> (hctx=0xffff8a1b7cccc000) at ../block/blk-mq-debugfs.c:897
> #11 0xffffffff983661cf in blk_mq_exit_hctx (q=0xffff8a1f825e4040,
> set=0xffff8a1f9be5a0c0, hctx=0xffff8a1b7cccc000, hctx_idx=2) at
> ../block/blk-mq.c:1987
> #12 0xffffffff9836946a in blk_mq_exit_hw_queues (nr_queue=<optimized
> out>, set=<optimized out>, q=<optimized out>) at ../block/blk-mq.c:2017
> #13 0xffffffff9836946a in blk_mq_free_queue (q=0xffff8a1f825e4040)
> at ../block/blk-mq.c:2506
> #14 0xffffffff9835aac5 in blk_cleanup_queue (q=0xffff8a1f825e4040)
> at ../block/blk-core.c:691
> #15 0xffffffffc01f5bc8 in nvme_ns_remove (ns=0xffff8a1f819e8f80)
> at ../drivers/nvme/host/core.c:3138
> #16 0xffffffffc01f6fea in nvme_validate_ns (ctrl=0xffff8a1f9be5a308, nsid=5)
> at ../drivers/nvme/host/core.c:3164
> #17 0xffffffffc01f9053 in nvme_scan_ns_list (nn=<optimized out>,
> ctrl=<optimized out>) at ../drivers/nvme/host/core.c:3202
> #18 0xffffffffc01f9053 in nvme_scan_work (work=<optimized out>)
> at ../drivers/nvme/host/core.c:3280
> #19 0xffffffff980a224a in process_one_work (worker=0xffff8a1b7349f6c0,
> work=0xffff8a1f9be5aba0) at ../kernel/workqueue.c:2092
>
> Point is that the queue is already dead by the time nvme_start_queues()
> tries to flush existing requests (of which there are none, of course).
> I had been looking into synchronizing scan_work and reset_work, but then
> I wasn't sure if that wouldn't deadlock somewhere.
James, do you agree that nvme_fc_reset_ctrl_work should be canceled before
nvme_ns_remove() is allowed to call blk_cleanup_queue()?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 12:07 [PATCH] block: don't call blk_mq_run_hw_queues() for dead or dying queues Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-26 13:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-26 14:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-26 15:12 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-03-26 15:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-26 17:49 ` James Smart
2019-03-26 17:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-27 0:05 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27 1:25 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1553613164.118779.50.camel@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox