From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, ZhangHui <zhanghui31@xiaomi.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] block: move non sync requests complete flow to softirq
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:47:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174b83d9-e109-441c-867f-36d52687a660@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <769fb0e4-6f55-4a2d-a0f2-e8836b790617@acm.org>
On 9/3/24 11:28 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/3/24 4:54 AM, ZhangHui wrote:
>> Currently, for a controller that supports multiple queues, like UFS4.0,
>> the mq_ops->complete is executed in the interrupt top-half. Therefore,
>> the file system's end io is executed during the request completion process,
>> such as f2fs_write_end_io on smartphone.
>>
>> However, we found that the execution time of the file system end io
>> is strongly related to the size of the bio and the processing speed
>> of the CPU. Because the file system's end io will traverse every page
>> in bio, this is a very time-consuming operation.
>>
>> We measured that the 80M bio write operation on the little CPU will
>> cause the execution time of the top-half to be greater than 100ms.
>> The CPU tick on a smartphone is only 4ms, which will undoubtedly affect
>> scheduling efficiency.
>>
>> Let's fixed this issue by moved non sync request completion flow to
>> softirq, and keep the sync request completion in the top-half.
>
> An explanation is missing from the patch description why this issue
> cannot be solved by changing rq_affinity to 2.
And what's also missing is a changelog - to the poster, always include
what's changed since the last version posted. Otherwise you just have
3 random patches posted and leave the discovery of why on earth there's
now a v3 to the reader in having to pull in all 3 versions and see if
the progression made sense.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-03 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-03 11:54 [PATCH v3] block: move non sync requests complete flow to softirq ZhangHui
2024-09-03 17:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-03 17:47 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-09-04 3:35 ` [External Mail]Re: " 章辉
2024-09-04 17:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-09-05 3:05 ` 章辉
2024-09-03 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-04 3:25 ` [External Mail]Re: " 章辉
2024-09-04 4:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-05 2:52 ` [External Mail]Re: " 章辉
2024-09-04 8:01 ` Ming Lei
2024-09-05 2:46 ` [External Mail]Re: " 章辉
2024-09-05 3:49 ` Ming Lei
2024-09-05 7:33 ` 章辉
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174b83d9-e109-441c-867f-36d52687a660@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhanghui31@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).