From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix a deadlock related to modifying the readahead attribute
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:01:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1816437d-240a-4834-bef9-c9c4a66bee0a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625195450.1172740-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
On 6/26/25 1:24 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Every time I run test srp/002 the following deadlock is triggered:
>
> task:multipathd
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __schedule+0x8c1/0x1bf0
> schedule+0xdd/0x270
> schedule_preempt_disabled+0x1c/0x30
> __mutex_lock+0xb89/0x1650
> mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
> dm_table_set_restrictions+0x823/0xdf0
> __bind+0x166/0x590
> dm_swap_table+0x2a7/0x490
> do_resume+0x1b1/0x610
> dev_suspend+0x55/0x1a0
> ctl_ioctl+0x3a5/0x7e0
> dm_ctl_ioctl+0x12/0x20
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x127/0x1a0
> x64_sys_call+0xe2b/0x17d0
> do_syscall_64+0x96/0x3a0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
> </TASK>
> task:(udev-worker)
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __schedule+0x8c1/0x1bf0
> schedule+0xdd/0x270
> blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0xf2/0x140
> blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x23/0x30
> queue_ra_store+0x14e/0x290
> queue_attr_store+0x23e/0x2c0
> sysfs_kf_write+0xde/0x140
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3b2/0x630
> vfs_write+0x4fd/0x1390
> ksys_write+0xfd/0x230
> __x64_sys_write+0x76/0xc0
> x64_sys_call+0x276/0x17d0
> do_syscall_64+0x96/0x3a0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
> </TASK>
It seems that some other thread on your system acquired
->freeze_lock and never released it and that prevents
the udev-worker thread to forward progress. As udev-worker
couldn't forward progress, it also now prevents the
multipathd to make progress (as multipathd is pending
on ->limits_lock which has been acquired by udev-worker).
If you haven't enabled lockdep on your system then can you
please configure lockdep and rerun the srp/002 test?
I think, you shall encounter a lockdep splat and that
shall help further investigate the deadlock.
Thanks,
--Nilay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 19:54 [PATCH] block: Fix a deadlock related to modifying the readahead attribute Bart Van Assche
2025-06-26 5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-26 16:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-06-26 5:31 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-06-26 16:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-06-27 6:16 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-27 15:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-06-30 10:41 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-30 15:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-07-01 4:56 ` Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1816437d-240a-4834-bef9-c9c4a66bee0a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox