From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: gumi@linux.alibaba.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: I/O error occurs during SATA disk stress test
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 20:30:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19dcc0d6-fe26-a9db-4d39-794ec78c94be@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002001d8bb57$000eabe0$002c03a0$@linux.alibaba.com>
On 8/28/22 20:25, gumi@linux.alibaba.com wrote:
> This problem occurs on kernel version 5.10, and i read this commit
> you mentioned. The problem I observed is not a problem of req re-used
> fixed by commit 2e315dc07df0, but a different problem. The specific
> scene is this: A new IO has called blk_mq_start_request() to start
> sending, and an instruction out of sequence occurs between
> blk_add_timer() and WRITE_ONCE(rq->state,MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT) in
> blk_mq_start_request(), so the req->state is set to MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT,
> but req->deadline still 0, and at this very moment, timeout
> handler(blk_mq_check_expired()) check if this new IO times out, this
> condition(if (time_after_eq(jiffies, deadline)) in
> blk_mq_req_expired() called by blk_mq_check_expired()) will is true.
> The end result is that this new IO is considered to have timed out. I
> looked at the latest kernel code and the problem persists, do you
> agree with my analysis process?
It seems unlikely to me that the above analysis is correct. If this
problem would occur with recent kernel versions, I think that it would
already have been reported by other Linux users.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 3:25 [PATCH v2] block: I/O error occurs during SATA disk stress test gumi
2022-08-29 3:30 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-29 4:11 gumi
2022-08-29 4:07 gumi
2022-08-26 3:25 gumi
2022-08-26 13:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-26 16:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-26 19:40 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-25 7:09 Gu Mi
2022-08-25 17:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-26 21:15 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19dcc0d6-fe26-a9db-4d39-794ec78c94be@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=gumi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).