From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 207 at drivers/nvme/host/core.c:527 nvme_setup_cmd+0x3d3
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 20:35:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ed647a3-7a4f-c288-ac4d-c1d42313626c@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef22f6c5-84c4-1ebf-b4b5-d0a2d1d29927@oracle.com>
On 1/31/18 8:33 PM, jianchao.wang wrote:
> Sorry, Jens, I think I didn't get the point.
> Do I miss anything ?
>
> On 02/01/2018 11:07 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Yeah I agree, and my last patch missed that we do care about segments for
>> discards. Below should be better...
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
>> index 8452fc7164cc..055057bd727f 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
>> @@ -553,9 +553,8 @@ static bool req_no_special_merge(struct request *req)
>> static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
>> struct request *next)
>> {
>> - int total_phys_segments;
>> - unsigned int seg_size =
>> - req->biotail->bi_seg_back_size + next->bio->bi_seg_front_size;
>> + int total_phys_segments = req->nr_phys_segments +
>> + next->nr_phys_segments;
>
> For DISCARD reqs, the total_phys_segments is still zero here.
This seems broken, it should count the ranges in the discard request.
>> @@ -574,8 +573,15 @@ static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
>> blk_rq_get_max_sectors(req, blk_rq_pos(req)))
>> return 0;
>>
>> - total_phys_segments = req->nr_phys_segments + next->nr_phys_segments;
>> - if (blk_phys_contig_segment(q, req->biotail, next->bio)) {
>> + /*
>> + * If the requests aren't carrying any data payloads, we don't need
>> + * to look at the segment count
>> + */
>> + if (bio_has_data(next->bio) &&
>> + blk_phys_contig_segment(q, req->biotail, next->bio)) {
>> + unsigned int seg_size = req->biotail->bi_seg_back_size +
>> + next->bio->bi_seg_front_size;
>
> Yes, total_phys_segments will not be decreased.
>
>> +
>> if (req->nr_phys_segments == 1)
>> req->bio->bi_seg_front_size = seg_size;
>> if (next->nr_phys_segments == 1)
>> @@ -584,7 +590,7 @@ static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
>> }
>>
>> if (total_phys_segments > queue_max_segments(q))
>> - return 0;
>> + return 0;
>>
>> if (blk_integrity_merge_rq(q, req, next) == false)
>> return 0;
>
> But finally, the merged DISCARD req's nr_phys_segment is still zero.
>
> blk_rq_nr_discard_segments will return 1 but this req has two bios.
> blk_rq_nr_discard_segments 's comment says
They should have the range count. The discard merge stuff is a bit of
a hack, it would be nice to get that improved.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-30 15:41 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 207 at drivers/nvme/host/core.c:527 nvme_setup_cmd+0x3d3 Jens Axboe
2018-01-30 15:57 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-30 20:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-30 20:32 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-30 20:49 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-30 20:55 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-31 4:25 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-31 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-31 23:33 ` Keith Busch
2018-02-01 3:03 ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01 3:03 ` jianchao.wang
2018-02-01 3:07 ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01 3:33 ` jianchao.wang
2018-02-01 3:35 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-02-01 4:56 ` Keith Busch
2018-02-01 15:26 ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01 17:58 ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01 18:12 ` Keith Busch
2018-02-01 19:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-02-01 20:55 ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01 18:01 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ed647a3-7a4f-c288-ac4d-c1d42313626c@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox