public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 207 at drivers/nvme/host/core.c:527 nvme_setup_cmd+0x3d3
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 20:35:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ed647a3-7a4f-c288-ac4d-c1d42313626c@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef22f6c5-84c4-1ebf-b4b5-d0a2d1d29927@oracle.com>

On 1/31/18 8:33 PM, jianchao.wang wrote:
> Sorry, Jens, I think I didn't get the point.
> Do I miss anything ?
> 
> On 02/01/2018 11:07 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Yeah I agree, and my last patch missed that we do care about segments for
>> discards. Below should be better...
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
>> index 8452fc7164cc..055057bd727f 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
>> @@ -553,9 +553,8 @@ static bool req_no_special_merge(struct request *req)
>>  static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
>>  				struct request *next)
>>  {
>> -	int total_phys_segments;
>> -	unsigned int seg_size =
>> -		req->biotail->bi_seg_back_size + next->bio->bi_seg_front_size;
>> +	int total_phys_segments = req->nr_phys_segments +
>> +					next->nr_phys_segments;
> 
> For DISCARD reqs, the total_phys_segments is still zero here.

This seems broken, it should count the ranges in the discard request.

>> @@ -574,8 +573,15 @@ static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
>>  	    blk_rq_get_max_sectors(req, blk_rq_pos(req)))
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>> -	total_phys_segments = req->nr_phys_segments + next->nr_phys_segments;
>> -	if (blk_phys_contig_segment(q, req->biotail, next->bio)) {
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If the requests aren't carrying any data payloads, we don't need
>> +	 * to look at the segment count
>> +	 */
>> +	if (bio_has_data(next->bio) &&
>> +	    blk_phys_contig_segment(q, req->biotail, next->bio)) {
>> +		unsigned int seg_size = req->biotail->bi_seg_back_size +
>> +						next->bio->bi_seg_front_size;
> 
> Yes, total_phys_segments will not be decreased.
> 
>> +
>>  		if (req->nr_phys_segments == 1)
>>  			req->bio->bi_seg_front_size = seg_size;
>>  		if (next->nr_phys_segments == 1)
>> @@ -584,7 +590,7 @@ static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (total_phys_segments > queue_max_segments(q))
>> -		return 0;
>> +			return 0;
>>  
>>  	if (blk_integrity_merge_rq(q, req, next) == false)
>>  		return 0;
> 
> But finally, the merged DISCARD req's nr_phys_segment is still zero.
> 
> blk_rq_nr_discard_segments will return 1 but this req has two bios.
> blk_rq_nr_discard_segments 's comment says

They should have the range count. The discard merge stuff is a bit of
a hack, it would be nice to get that improved.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-01  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-30 15:41 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 207 at drivers/nvme/host/core.c:527 nvme_setup_cmd+0x3d3 Jens Axboe
2018-01-30 15:57 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-30 20:30   ` Keith Busch
2018-01-30 20:32     ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-30 20:49       ` Keith Busch
2018-01-30 20:55         ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-31  4:25   ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-31 15:29     ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-31 23:33       ` Keith Busch
2018-02-01  3:03         ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01  3:03       ` jianchao.wang
2018-02-01  3:07         ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01  3:33           ` jianchao.wang
2018-02-01  3:35             ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-02-01  4:56           ` Keith Busch
2018-02-01 15:26             ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01 17:58               ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01 18:12                 ` Keith Busch
2018-02-01 19:52                 ` Keith Busch
2018-02-01 20:55                   ` Jens Axboe
2018-02-01 18:01               ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ed647a3-7a4f-c288-ac4d-c1d42313626c@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox