linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] check the number of hw queues mapped to sw queues
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:05:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608230529.GD1696@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1ivSbEf-069LBRLRJKDd-e7JuF3jKrZr6yu-fANFajMGR_=w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:47:10PM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> wrote:
> > I've been trying to change blk_mq_update_queue_map to do this, but it's
> > not as easy as it sounds. The following is the simplest patch I came
> > up with that gets a better mapping *most* of the time.
> 
> Not working for my case with 6 hw queues(8 cpus):
> 
> [  108.318247] nvme nvme0: 6 hw queues created, but only 5 were mapped
> to sw queues
> 
> hctx_idx 0: 0 1 4 5
> hctx_idx 1: None
> hctx_idx 2: 2
> hctx_idx 3: 3
> hctx_idx 4: 6
> hctx_idx 5: 7

Heh, not one of the good cases I see. I don't think there's a simple
change to use all contexts. Might need a larger rewrite.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-08 19:48 [PATCH 0/2] check the number of hw queues mapped to sw queues Ming Lin
2016-06-08 19:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: add a function to return number of hw queues mapped Ming Lin
2016-06-08 19:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-rdma: check the " Ming Lin
2016-06-09 11:19   ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-06-09 14:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-09 19:47       ` Ming Lin
2016-06-08 22:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] check the number of hw queues mapped to sw queues Keith Busch
2016-06-08 22:47   ` Ming Lin
2016-06-08 23:05     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-06-09 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-09 19:43   ` Ming Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160608230529.GD1696@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mlin@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).