From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
mark.bergman@uphs.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: block: don't check request size in blk_cloned_rq_check_limits()
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:29:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615022903.GB5443@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq17fdrcjs3.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:39pm -0400,
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
>
> Hannes> Well, the primary issue is that 'blk_cloned_rq_check_limits()'
> Hannes> doesn't check for BLOCK_PC,
>
> Yes it does. It calls blk_rq_get_max_sectors() which has an explicit
> check for this:
>
> static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_sectors(struct request *rq)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
>
> if (unlikely(rq->cmd_type != REQ_TYPE_FS))
> return q->limits.max_hw_sectors;
> [...]
>
> Hannes> The max_segments count, OTOH, _might_ change during failover
> Hannes> (different hardware has different max_segments setting, and this
> Hannes> is being changed during sg mapping), so there is some value to
> Hannes> be had from testing it here.
>
> Oh, this happens during failover? Are you sure it's not because DM is
> temporarily resetting the queue limits? max_sectors is going to be a
> single page in that case. I just discussed a backport regression in this
> department with Mike at LSF/MM. But that was for an older kernel.
Not aware of any limits reset issue now...
> Accidentally resetting the limits during table swaps has happened a
> couple of times over the years. We trip it instantly with the database
> in failover testing.
But feel free to throw your DB in failover tests (w/ dm-mpath) at a
recent kernel ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-30 7:24 [PATCH] block: don't check request size in blk_cloned_rq_check_limits() Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-10 13:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-10 13:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-10 14:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-11 10:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11 2:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-11 10:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11 11:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-11 13:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-13 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 1:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-15 2:29 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2016-06-15 2:32 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-15 6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-15 10:03 ` Jens Axboe
2016-06-15 10:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-15 16:34 ` Brian King
2016-06-16 12:35 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-06-16 21:59 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-06-17 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160615022903.GB5443@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.bergman@uphs.upenn.edu \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).