linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	mark.bergman@uphs.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: block: don't check request size in blk_cloned_rq_check_limits()
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:29:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615022903.GB5443@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq17fdrcjs3.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at  9:39pm -0400,
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote:

> >>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
> 
> Hannes> Well, the primary issue is that 'blk_cloned_rq_check_limits()'
> Hannes> doesn't check for BLOCK_PC,
> 
> Yes it does. It calls blk_rq_get_max_sectors() which has an explicit
> check for this:
> 
> static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_sectors(struct request *rq)
> {
>         struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
> 
>         if (unlikely(rq->cmd_type != REQ_TYPE_FS))
>                         return q->limits.max_hw_sectors;
> [...]
> 
> Hannes> The max_segments count, OTOH, _might_ change during failover
> Hannes> (different hardware has different max_segments setting, and this
> Hannes> is being changed during sg mapping), so there is some value to
> Hannes> be had from testing it here.
> 
> Oh, this happens during failover? Are you sure it's not because DM is
> temporarily resetting the queue limits? max_sectors is going to be a
> single page in that case. I just discussed a backport regression in this
> department with Mike at LSF/MM. But that was for an older kernel.

Not aware of any limits reset issue now...

> Accidentally resetting the limits during table swaps has happened a
> couple of times over the years. We trip it instantly with the database
> in failover testing.

But feel free to throw your DB in failover tests (w/ dm-mpath) at a
recent kernel ;)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-15  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-30  7:24 [PATCH] block: don't check request size in blk_cloned_rq_check_limits() Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-10 13:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-10 13:30   ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-10 14:18     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-11 10:05       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11  2:22   ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-11 10:01     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11 11:06       ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-11 13:10         ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-13  8:07           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15  1:39           ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-15  2:29             ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2016-06-15  2:32               ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-15  6:33             ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-15 10:03               ` Jens Axboe
2016-06-15 10:33                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-15 16:34                   ` Brian King
2016-06-16 12:35                     ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-06-16 21:59                       ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-06-17  6:59                         ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160615022903.GB5443@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.bergman@uphs.upenn.edu \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).