linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Cc: ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	david@fromorbit.com, minchan@kernel.org, ngupta@vflare.org,
	vishal.l.verma@intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/block: convert rw_page users to bio op use
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 00:57:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160805075756.GA28577@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470331056-796-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com>

> 
> The rw_page users were not converted to use bio/req ops. As a result
> bdev_write_page is not passing down REQ_OP_WRITE and the IOs will
> be sent down as reads.

Can we just get rid of REQ_OP_WRITE enum for the ->rw_page interface
and pass a 'bool write'?  If not I'd prefer to avoid using op_is_write
as much as possible - it's a confusing interface if we really want
to do a switch on read vs write vs invalid.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-05  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-04 17:17 [PATCH 1/1] mm/block: convert rw_page users to bio op use Mike Christie
2016-08-04 17:50 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-04 19:27   ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-04 19:59     ` Mike Christie
2016-08-04 20:15       ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-04 21:24         ` Mike Christie
2016-08-04 21:26           ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-05  2:18     ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-05  3:30       ` Mike Christie
2016-08-05  7:53       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-04 18:46 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-08-04 18:51   ` Mike Christie
2016-08-05  7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-08-05 13:52   ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-05 14:09     ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-05 18:05       ` Mike Christie
2016-08-05 21:27         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160805075756.GA28577@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).