Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Use non-atomic operations to manipulate the sw-ctx busy bits
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:18:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160901011849.GA8276@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa1d8314-3c5e-4554-61e1-95c61aa11624@sandisk.com>

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:03:24PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Protect sw-ctx busy bit manipulations via the sw queue lock.
> This allows to convert the atomic bit operations into slightly
> faster non-atomic operations. Document that blk_mq_run_hw_queues()
> tests these bits without holding the sw queue lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 13f5a6c..0dcafa6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -66,8 +66,9 @@ static void blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  {
>  	struct blk_align_bitmap *bm = get_bm(hctx, ctx);
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
>  	if (!test_bit(CTX_TO_BIT(hctx, ctx), &bm->word))
> -		set_bit(CTX_TO_BIT(hctx, ctx), &bm->word);
> +		__set_bit(CTX_TO_BIT(hctx, ctx), &bm->word);
>  }
>  
>  static void blk_mq_hctx_clear_pending(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> @@ -75,7 +76,8 @@ static void blk_mq_hctx_clear_pending(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  {
>  	struct blk_align_bitmap *bm = get_bm(hctx, ctx);
>  
> -	clear_bit(CTX_TO_BIT(hctx, ctx), &bm->word);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
> +	__clear_bit(CTX_TO_BIT(hctx, ctx), &bm->word);
>  }

NAK, we can't protect each bit with a separate lock, multiple software
queues share the bitmap. There's a race if we do non-atomic bit
operations on two software queues with bits in the same word.

-- 
Omar

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-01  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-31 22:03 [PATCH] blk-mq: Use non-atomic operations to manipulate the sw-ctx busy bits Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01  1:18 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2016-09-01  3:13   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160901011849.GA8276@vader \
    --to=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox