linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	axboe@fb.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 21:48:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160905194759.GA26008@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160901142410.GA10903@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:24:10AM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:46:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:38:53PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > This can't be right. We have a single affinity mask for the entire
> > > set, but what I think we want is an one affinity mask for each
> > > nr_io_queues. The irq_create_affinity_mask should then create an array
> > > of cpumasks based on nr_vecs..
> > 
> > Nah, this is Thomas' creating abuse of the cpumask type.  Every bit set
> > in the affinity_mask means this is a cpu we allocate a vector / queue to.
> 
> Yeah, I gathered that's what it was providing, but that's just barely
> not enough information to do something useful. The CPUs that aren't set
> have to use a previously assigned vector/queue, but which one?

Always the previous one.  Below is a patch to get us back to the
previous behavior:

diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 32f6cfc..09d4407 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct cpumask *irq_create_affinity_mask(unsigned int *nr_vecs)
 {
 	struct cpumask *affinity_mask;
 	unsigned int max_vecs = *nr_vecs;
+	unsigned int nr_cpus = 0, nr_uniq_cpus = 0, cpu;
+	unsigned int vec = 0, prev = -1, idx = 0;
 
 	if (max_vecs == 1)
 		return NULL;
@@ -40,24 +42,27 @@ struct cpumask *irq_create_affinity_mask(unsigned int *nr_vecs)
 	}
 
 	get_online_cpus();
-	if (max_vecs >= num_online_cpus()) {
-		cpumask_copy(affinity_mask, cpu_online_mask);
-		*nr_vecs = num_online_cpus();
-	} else {
-		unsigned int vecs = 0, cpu;
-
-		for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-			if (cpu == get_first_sibling(cpu)) {
-				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, affinity_mask);
-				vecs++;
-			}
-
-			if (--max_vecs == 0)
-				break;
-		}
-		*nr_vecs = vecs;
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		nr_cpus++;
+		if (cpu == get_first_sibling(cpu))
+			nr_uniq_cpus++;
+	}
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		if (max_vecs >= nr_cpus || nr_cpus == nr_uniq_cpus)
+			vec = idx * max_vecs / nr_cpus;
+		else if (cpu == get_first_sibling(cpu))
+			vec = idx * max_vecs / nr_uniq_cpus;
+		else
+			continue;
+
+		if (vec != prev)
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, affinity_mask);
+		prev = vec;
+		idx++;
 	}
 	put_online_cpus();
 
+	*nr_vecs = idx;
 	return affinity_mask;
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-05 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-29 10:53 blk-mq: allow passing in an external queue mapping V2 Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: don't redistribute hardware queues on a CPU hotplug event Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: only allocate a single mq_map per tag_set Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: remove ->map_queue Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-31 16:38   ` Keith Busch
2016-09-01  8:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-01 14:24       ` Keith Busch
2016-09-01 23:30         ` Keith Busch
2016-09-05 19:48         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-09-06 14:39           ` Keith Busch
2016-09-06 16:50             ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-06 17:30               ` Keith Busch
2016-09-07 15:38               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] nvme: switch to use pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] nvme: remove the post_scan callout Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: get rid of the cpumask in struct blk_mq_tags Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-30 23:28 ` blk-mq: allow passing in an external queue mapping V2 Keith Busch
2016-09-01  8:45   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160905194759.GA26008@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).