* [PATCH] sbitmap: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning
@ 2016-09-19 12:33 Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-19 14:43 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-09-19 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Omar Sandoval, linux-block, linux-kernel
The sbitmap code that has just been turned into a library module
returns uninitialized data for sbitmap_weight(), as pointed out by
gcc when building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized:
lib/sbitmap.c: In function 'sbitmap_weight':
lib/sbitmap.c:179:9: error: 'weight' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
Note that the value is never initialized, we just add data on
top, so it is wrong regardless of sb->map_nr.
This adds the missing initialization.
Fixes: 88459642cba4 ("blk-mq: abstract tag allocation out into sbitmap library")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
lib/sbitmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
index e40808921544..2cecf05c82fd 100644
--- a/lib/sbitmap.c
+++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_any_bit_clear);
unsigned int sbitmap_weight(const struct sbitmap *sb)
{
- unsigned int i, weight;
+ unsigned int i, weight = 0;
for (i = 0; i < sb->map_nr; i++) {
const struct sbitmap_word *word = &sb->map[i];
--
2.9.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sbitmap: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning 2016-09-19 12:33 [PATCH] sbitmap: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-09-19 14:43 ` Jens Axboe 2016-09-19 15:14 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2016-09-19 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: Omar Sandoval, linux-block, linux-kernel On 09/19/2016 06:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The sbitmap code that has just been turned into a library module > returns uninitialized data for sbitmap_weight(), as pointed out by > gcc when building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized: > > lib/sbitmap.c: In function 'sbitmap_weight': > lib/sbitmap.c:179:9: error: 'weight' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > Note that the value is never initialized, we just add data on > top, so it is wrong regardless of sb->map_nr. > > This adds the missing initialization. Thanks Arnd, Colin sent the same patch and I applied it. Note that: > Fixes: 88459642cba4 ("blk-mq: abstract tag allocation out into sbitmap library") that isn't truly correct, that patch is just what moved the code. The bug predates that commit. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sbitmap: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning 2016-09-19 14:43 ` Jens Axboe @ 2016-09-19 15:14 ` Arnd Bergmann 2016-09-19 15:22 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-09-19 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Omar Sandoval, linux-block, linux-kernel On Monday, September 19, 2016 8:43:12 AM CEST Jens Axboe wrote: > On 09/19/2016 06:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The sbitmap code that has just been turned into a library module > > returns uninitialized data for sbitmap_weight(), as pointed out by > > gcc when building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized: > > > > lib/sbitmap.c: In function 'sbitmap_weight': > > lib/sbitmap.c:179:9: error: 'weight' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > > > Note that the value is never initialized, we just add data on > > top, so it is wrong regardless of sb->map_nr. > > > > This adds the missing initialization. > > Thanks Arnd, Colin sent the same patch and I applied it. Note that: Ok, thanks! > > Fixes: 88459642cba4 ("blk-mq: abstract tag allocation out into sbitmap library") > > that isn't truly correct, that patch is just what moved the code. The > bug predates that commit. It's not important as long as the bug is fixed now, but I think it was correct before that move, we just lost the 'used=0' initialization, which also triggered the warning: -static unsigned int bt_unused_tags(struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt) -{ - unsigned int i, used; - - for (i = 0, used = 0; i < bt->map_nr; i++) { - struct blk_align_bitmap *bm = &bt->map[i]; - - used += bitmap_weight(&bm->word, bm->depth); } - return bt->depth - used; } Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sbitmap: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning 2016-09-19 15:14 ` Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-09-19 15:22 ` Jens Axboe 2016-09-19 15:41 ` Omar Sandoval 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2016-09-19 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: Omar Sandoval, linux-block, linux-kernel On 09/19/2016 09:14 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday, September 19, 2016 8:43:12 AM CEST Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 09/19/2016 06:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> The sbitmap code that has just been turned into a library module >>> returns uninitialized data for sbitmap_weight(), as pointed out by >>> gcc when building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized: >>> >>> lib/sbitmap.c: In function 'sbitmap_weight': >>> lib/sbitmap.c:179:9: error: 'weight' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] >>> >>> Note that the value is never initialized, we just add data on >>> top, so it is wrong regardless of sb->map_nr. >>> >>> This adds the missing initialization. >> >> Thanks Arnd, Colin sent the same patch and I applied it. Note that: > > Ok, thanks! > >>> Fixes: 88459642cba4 ("blk-mq: abstract tag allocation out into sbitmap library") >> >> that isn't truly correct, that patch is just what moved the code. The >> bug predates that commit. > > It's not important as long as the bug is fixed now, but I think it was > correct before that move, we just lost the 'used=0' initialization, > which also triggered the warning: > > -static unsigned int bt_unused_tags(struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt) > -{ > - unsigned int i, used; > - > - for (i = 0, used = 0; i < bt->map_nr; i++) { > - struct blk_align_bitmap *bm = &bt->map[i]; > - > - used += bitmap_weight(&bm->word, bm->depth); > } > > - return bt->depth - used; > } I missed that, as I generally never use double inits in for loops, but I guess I did for this one. But you are right, the bug was introduced with the recent move, so your Fixes was completely correct. Omar loses a cookie. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sbitmap: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning 2016-09-19 15:22 ` Jens Axboe @ 2016-09-19 15:41 ` Omar Sandoval 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Omar Sandoval @ 2016-09-19 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Omar Sandoval, linux-block, linux-kernel On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:22:34AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 09/19/2016 09:14 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday, September 19, 2016 8:43:12 AM CEST Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On 09/19/2016 06:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > The sbitmap code that has just been turned into a library module > > > > returns uninitialized data for sbitmap_weight(), as pointed out by > > > > gcc when building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized: > > > > > > > > lib/sbitmap.c: In function 'sbitmap_weight': > > > > lib/sbitmap.c:179:9: error: 'weight' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > > > > > > > Note that the value is never initialized, we just add data on > > > > top, so it is wrong regardless of sb->map_nr. > > > > > > > > This adds the missing initialization. > > > > > > Thanks Arnd, Colin sent the same patch and I applied it. Note that: > > > > Ok, thanks! > > > > > > Fixes: 88459642cba4 ("blk-mq: abstract tag allocation out into sbitmap library") > > > > > > that isn't truly correct, that patch is just what moved the code. The > > > bug predates that commit. > > > > It's not important as long as the bug is fixed now, but I think it was > > correct before that move, we just lost the 'used=0' initialization, > > which also triggered the warning: > > > > -static unsigned int bt_unused_tags(struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt) > > -{ > > - unsigned int i, used; > > - > > - for (i = 0, used = 0; i < bt->map_nr; i++) { > > - struct blk_align_bitmap *bm = &bt->map[i]; > > - > > - used += bitmap_weight(&bm->word, bm->depth); > > } > > > > - return bt->depth - used; > > } > > I missed that, as I generally never use double inits in for loops, but I > guess I did for this one. But you are right, the bug was introduced with > the recent move, so your Fixes was completely correct. > > Omar loses a cookie. :( Apparently we disable -Wmaybe-uninitialized by default since 6e8d666e9253 ("Disable "maybe-uninitialized" warning globally"), that's probably why I didn't see this. My mistake, thanks Arnd and Colin. -- Omar ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-19 15:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-09-19 12:33 [PATCH] sbitmap: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann 2016-09-19 14:43 ` Jens Axboe 2016-09-19 15:14 ` Arnd Bergmann 2016-09-19 15:22 ` Jens Axboe 2016-09-19 15:41 ` Omar Sandoval
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).