From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Un-addressable device memory and block/fs implications
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 18:02:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161213230257.GH2305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4accd272-7214-c702-aed3-fb131f178162@intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:08:22PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 01:24 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >
> >>> > > From kernel point of view such memory is almost like any other, it
> >>> > > has a struct page and most of the mm code is non the wiser, nor need
> >>> > > to be about it. CPU access trigger a migration back to regular CPU
> >>> > > accessible page.
> >> >
> >> > That sounds ... complex. Page migration on page cache access inside
> >> > the filesytem IO path locking during read()/write() sounds like
> >> > a great way to cause deadlocks....
> > There are few restriction on device page, no one can do GUP on them and
> > thus no one can pin them. Hence they can always be migrated back. Yes
> > each fs need modification, most of it (if not all) is isolated in common
> > filemap helpers.
>
> Huh, that's pretty different from the other ZONE_DEVICE uses. For
> those, you *can* do get_user_pages().
>
> I'd be really interested to see the feature set that these pages have
> and how it differs from regular memory and the ZONE_DEVICE memory that
> have have in-kernel today.
Well i can do a list for current patchset where i do not allow migration
of file back page. Roughly you can not kmap and GUP. But GUP has many more
implications like direct I/O (source or destination of direct I/O) ...
>
> BTW, how is this restriction implemented? I would have expected to see
> follow_page_pte() or vm_normal_page() getting modified. I don't see a
> single reference to get_user_pages or "GUP" in any of the latest HMM
> patch set or the changelogs.
>
> As best I can tell, the slow GUP path will get stuck in a loop inside
> follow_page_pte(), while the fast GUP path will allow you to acquire a
> reference to the page. But, maybe I'm reading the code wrong.
It is a side effect of having a special swap pte so follow_page_pte()
returns NULL which trigger page fault through handle_mm_fault() which
trigger migration back to regular page. Same for fast GUP version.
There is never a valid pte for an un-addressable page.
Cheers,
J�rome
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-13 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-13 18:15 [LSF/MM TOPIC] Un-addressable device memory and block/fs implications Jerome Glisse
2016-12-13 18:20 ` James Bottomley
2016-12-13 18:55 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-13 20:01 ` James Bottomley
2016-12-13 20:22 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-13 20:27 ` Dave Hansen
2016-12-13 20:15 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-13 20:31 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-13 21:10 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-13 21:24 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-13 22:08 ` Dave Hansen
2016-12-13 23:02 ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2016-12-13 22:13 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-13 22:55 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-14 0:14 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-14 1:07 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-14 4:23 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-14 16:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-14 11:13 ` [Lsf-pc] " Jan Kara
2016-12-14 17:15 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-15 16:19 ` Jan Kara
2016-12-15 19:14 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-12-16 8:14 ` Jan Kara
2016-12-16 3:10 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-12-19 8:46 ` Jan Kara
2016-12-19 17:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-12-14 3:55 ` Balbir Singh
2016-12-16 3:14 ` [LSF/MM ATTEND] " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-01-16 12:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-01-18 11:00 ` [Lsf-pc] " Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161213230257.GH2305@redhat.com \
--to=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).