From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] block: split scsi_request out of struct request
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:59:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112035911.GB27546@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484060780-15592-16-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Jan 10 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> And require all drivers that want to support BLOCK_PC to allocate it
> as the first thing of their private data. To support this the legacy
> IDE and BSG code is switched to set cmd_size on their queues to let
> the block layer allocate the additional space.
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index be23859..499728d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -225,17 +225,7 @@ struct request {
> int tag;
> int errors;
>
> - /*
> - * when request is used as a packet command carrier
> - */
> - unsigned char __cmd[BLK_MAX_CDB];
> - unsigned char *cmd;
> - unsigned short cmd_len;
> -
> unsigned int extra_len; /* length of alignment and padding */
> - unsigned int sense_len;
> - unsigned int resid_len; /* residual count */
> - void *sense;
Oh yes, my mouth is watering. I've wanted to kill off ->cmd and friends
with fire for years.
On the block front, I think the solution is fine with mimicking the mq
solution of carrying an rq payload, and the implementation for the
legacy path looks fine.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-10 15:06 RFC: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] virtio_blk: avoid DMA to stack for the sense buffer Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 8:26 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] nvme-rdma: fix nvme_rdma_queue_is_ready Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: simplify blk_init_allocated_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] block: allow specifying size for extra command data Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] dm: remove incomple BLOCK_PC support Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12 1:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12 22:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-13 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] scsi_dh_rdac: switch to scsi_execute_req_flags() Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] scsi_dh_emc: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] scsi_dh_hp_sw: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] scsi: remove gfp_flags member in scsi_host_cmd_pool Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] scsi: respect unchecked_isa_dma for blk-mq Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] scsi: remove scsi_cmd_dma_pool Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] scsi: remove __scsi_alloc_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] scsi: allocate scsi_cmnd structures as part of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] block/bsg: move queue creation into bsg_setup_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 8:42 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 8:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 8:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 9:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 22:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-11 22:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12 7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] block: split scsi_request out of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12 3:59 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-01-11 22:41 ` RFC: split scsi passthrough fields " Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112035911.GB27546@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).