linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] block: split scsi_request out of struct request
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:59:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112035911.GB27546@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484060780-15592-16-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>

On Tue, Jan 10 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> And require all drivers that want to support BLOCK_PC to allocate it
> as the first thing of their private data.  To support this the legacy
> IDE and BSG code is switched to set cmd_size on their queues to let
> the block layer allocate the additional space.

> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index be23859..499728d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -225,17 +225,7 @@ struct request {
>  	int tag;
>  	int errors;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * when request is used as a packet command carrier
> -	 */
> -	unsigned char __cmd[BLK_MAX_CDB];
> -	unsigned char *cmd;
> -	unsigned short cmd_len;
> -
>  	unsigned int extra_len;	/* length of alignment and padding */
> -	unsigned int sense_len;
> -	unsigned int resid_len;	/* residual count */
> -	void *sense;

Oh yes, my mouth is watering. I've wanted to kill off ->cmd and friends
with fire for years.

On the block front, I think the solution is fine with mimicking the mq
solution of carrying an rq payload, and the implementation for the
legacy path looks fine.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-12  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-10 15:06 RFC: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] virtio_blk: avoid DMA to stack for the sense buffer Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11  8:26   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11  8:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] nvme-rdma: fix nvme_rdma_queue_is_ready Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: simplify blk_init_allocated_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] block: allow specifying size for extra command data Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] dm: remove incomple BLOCK_PC support Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12  1:09   ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12  8:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12 22:28       ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-13  8:14         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] scsi_dh_rdac: switch to scsi_execute_req_flags() Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] scsi_dh_emc: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] scsi_dh_hp_sw: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] scsi: remove gfp_flags member in scsi_host_cmd_pool Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] scsi: respect unchecked_isa_dma for blk-mq Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] scsi: remove scsi_cmd_dma_pool Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] scsi: remove __scsi_alloc_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] scsi: allocate scsi_cmnd structures as part of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] block/bsg: move queue creation into bsg_setup_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11  8:42   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11  8:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11  8:56       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11  8:59         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11  8:59       ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11  9:01         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11  9:37           ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 22:08             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-11 22:01       ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12  7:57         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] block: split scsi_request out of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12  3:59   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-01-11 22:41 ` RFC: split scsi passthrough fields " Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12  7:59   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170112035911.GB27546@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).