From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:59:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112075952.GC7567@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170111224142.GA19238@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:41:42PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> I removed blk-mq on request_fn paths support because it was one of the
> permutations that I felt least useful/stable (see commit c5248f79f3 "dm:
> remove support for stacking dm-mq on .request_fn device(s)")
>
> As for all of the different IO paths. I've always liked the idea of
> blk-mq ruling the world. With Jens' blk-mq IO scheduling advances maybe
> we're closer!
That removed blk-mq on top of request_fn code would do the right thing
for this series if it entirely replaced the old request_fn code in dm-mpath.
(as would the new bio code for that matter)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-10 15:06 RFC: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] virtio_blk: avoid DMA to stack for the sense buffer Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 8:26 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] nvme-rdma: fix nvme_rdma_queue_is_ready Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: simplify blk_init_allocated_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] block: allow specifying size for extra command data Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] dm: remove incomple BLOCK_PC support Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12 1:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12 22:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-13 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] scsi_dh_rdac: switch to scsi_execute_req_flags() Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] scsi_dh_emc: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] scsi_dh_hp_sw: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] scsi: remove gfp_flags member in scsi_host_cmd_pool Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] scsi: respect unchecked_isa_dma for blk-mq Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] scsi: remove scsi_cmd_dma_pool Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] scsi: remove __scsi_alloc_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] scsi: allocate scsi_cmnd structures as part of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] block/bsg: move queue creation into bsg_setup_queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 8:42 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 8:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 8:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-11 9:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 22:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-11 22:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12 7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] block: split scsi_request out of struct request Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12 3:59 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 22:41 ` RFC: split scsi passthrough fields " Mike Snitzer
2017-01-12 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112075952.GC7567@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).