Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: axboe@fb.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [bug report] blk-mq-tag: cleanup the normal/reserved tag allocation
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:54:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170119105449.GA18622@mwanda> (raw)

Hello Jens Axboe,

This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.

The patch 4941115bef2b: "blk-mq-tag: cleanup the normal/reserved tag 
allocation" from Jan 13, 2017, leads to the following Smatch 
complaint:

block/blk-mq-tag.c:142 blk_mq_get_tag()
	 warn: variable dereferenced before check 'data->hctx' (see line 102)

block/blk-mq-tag.c
   101	{
   102		struct blk_mq_tags *tags = blk_mq_tags_from_data(data);
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We added a new "data->hctx" dereference here.

   103		struct sbitmap_queue *bt;
   104		struct sbq_wait_state *ws;
   105		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
   106		unsigned int tag_offset;
   107		int tag;
   108	
   109		if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED) {
   110			if (unlikely(!tags->nr_reserved_tags)) {
   111				WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
   112				return BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL;
   113			}
   114			bt = &tags->breserved_tags;
   115			tag_offset = 0;
   116		} else {
   117			bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
   118			tag_offset = tags->nr_reserved_tags;
   119		}
   120	
   121		tag = __blk_mq_get_tag(data->hctx, bt);
   122		if (tag != -1)
   123			goto found_tag;
   124	
   125		if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT)
   126			return BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL;
   127	
   128		ws = bt_wait_ptr(bt, data->hctx);
   129		do {
   130			prepare_to_wait(&ws->wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
   131	
   132			tag = __blk_mq_get_tag(data->hctx, bt);
   133			if (tag != -1)
   134				break;
   135	
   136			/*
   137			 * We're out of tags on this hardware queue, kick any
   138			 * pending IO submits before going to sleep waiting for
   139			 * some to complete. Note that hctx can be NULL here for
   140			 * reserved tag allocation.
   141			 */
   142			if (data->hctx)

We're in a loop here so it's possible we don't need to check the first
item in the list, but it's kind of new so I thought I would forward the
message anyway even though it might be a false positive.

   143				blk_mq_run_hw_queue(data->hctx, false);
   144	

regards,
dan carpenter

             reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-19 10:54 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2017-01-19 14:13 ` [bug report] blk-mq-tag: cleanup the normal/reserved tag allocation Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170119105449.GA18622@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox