From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:22:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170120122254.GA5947@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f10b8508-22a2-2959-c369-2dd29f271d2c@grimberg.me>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 05:45:53PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> >--
> >[1]
> >queue = b'nvme0q1'
> > usecs : count distribution
> > 0 -> 1 : 7310 |****************************************|
> > 2 -> 3 : 11 | |
> > 4 -> 7 : 10 | |
> > 8 -> 15 : 20 | |
> > 16 -> 31 : 0 | |
> > 32 -> 63 : 0 | |
> > 64 -> 127 : 1 | |
> >
> >[2]
> >queue = b'nvme0q1'
> > usecs : count distribution
> > 0 -> 1 : 7309 |****************************************|
> > 2 -> 3 : 14 | |
> > 4 -> 7 : 7 | |
> > 8 -> 15 : 17 | |
> >
>
> Rrr, email made the histograms look funky (tabs vs. spaces...)
> The count is what's important anyways...
>
> Just adding that I used an Intel P3500 nvme device.
>
> >We can see that most of the time our latency is pretty good (<1ns) but with
> >huge tail latencies (some 8-15 ns and even one in 32-63 ns).
>
> Obviously is micro-seconds and not nano-seconds (I wish...)
So to share yesterday's (and today's) findings:
On AHCI I see only one completion polled as well.
This probably is because in contrast to networking (with NAPI) in the block
layer we do have a link between submission and completion whereas in networking
RX and TX are decoupled. So if we're sending out one request we get the
completion for it.
What we'd need is a link to know "we've sent 10 requests out, now poll for the
10 completions after the 1st IRQ". So basically what NVMe already did with
calling __nvme_process_cq() after submission. Maybe we should even disable
IRQs when submitting and re-enable after submitting so the
submission patch doesn't get preempted by a completion.
Does this make sense?
Byte,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�rnberg
GF: Felix Imend�rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N�rnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-20 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 13:43 [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 13:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 15:07 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 15:13 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-12 8:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 10:02 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 11:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 12:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 14:41 ` [Lsf-pc] " Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 18:59 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 15:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 15:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-20 12:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2017-01-17 16:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 16:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 13:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 14:27 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 14:36 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-18 14:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 15:35 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-18 14:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 15:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 15:16 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 15:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-19 8:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-19 8:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-19 9:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-19 9:13 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:44 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-17 16:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 14:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-20 0:13 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-13 15:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 15:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-12 4:36 ` Stephen Bates
2017-01-12 4:44 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-12 4:56 ` Stephen Bates
2017-01-19 10:57 ` Ming Lei
2017-01-19 11:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:12 ` hch
2017-01-11 16:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 16:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-12 8:52 ` sagi grimberg
2017-01-11 16:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 8:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 19:13 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170120122254.GA5947@linux-x5ow.site \
--to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).