From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:14:16 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Hugh Dickins , Andrea Arcangeli , Dave Hansen , Vlastimil Babka , Ross Zwisler , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 05/37] thp: try to free page's buffers before attempt split Message-ID: <20170209201416.GS2267@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20170126115819.58875-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20170126115819.58875-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170126115819.58875-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:57:47PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > @@ -2146,6 +2146,23 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list) > goto out; > } > > + /* Try to free buffers before attempt split */ > + if (!PageSwapBacked(head) && PagePrivate(page)) { > + /* > + * We cannot trigger writeback from here due possible > + * recursion if triggered from vmscan, only wait. > + * > + * Caller can trigger writeback it on its own, if safe. > + */ It took me a few reads to get this. May I suggest: /* * Cannot split a page with buffers. If the caller has * already started writeback, we can wait for it to finish, * but we cannot start writeback if we were called from vmscan */ > + if (!PageSwapBacked(head) && PagePrivate(page)) { Also, it looks weird to test PageSwapBacked of *head* and PagePrivate of *page*. I think it's correct, but it still looks weird. Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox