From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block pull request for- 4.11-rc1
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:35:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220073539.GA17687@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <633d226d-cec3-a01f-a069-ffff307e9715@kernel.dk>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 06:15:41PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I don't think that's a regression in this series, it just triggers more easily
> with this series. The BLOCK_PC removal fixes aren't touching device life times
> at all.
Yes.
> That said, we will look into this again, of course. Christoph, any idea?
No idea really - this seems so far away from the code touched, and there
are no obvious signs for a memory scamble from another object touched
that I think if it really bisects down to that issue it must be a timing
issue.
But reading Bart's message again: Did you actually bisect it down
to the is commit? Or just test the whole tree? Between the 4.10-rc5
merge and all the block tree there might a few more likely suspects
like the scsi bdi lifetime fixes that James mentioned.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 0:10 [GIT PULL] Block pull request for- 4.11-rc1 Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 1:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-20 1:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 2:12 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-20 2:59 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 3:02 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-02-20 16:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-20 16:32 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 1:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-24 17:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-24 17:51 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-24 20:00 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 20:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 21:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-25 18:17 ` hch
2017-02-25 18:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-21 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-21 23:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:52 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 21:29 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:44 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 21:50 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-02-22 21:55 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-23 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170220073539.GA17687@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).