From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: connect cmd error for nvme-rdma with eventual kernel crash
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 21:50:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170301055045.GA27251@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0502MB3008EA53FCF29CF9E993918BD1290@VI1PR0502MB3008.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:55:23AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jens Axboe [mailto:axboe@kernel.dk]
> > Subject: Re: connect cmd error for nvme-rdma with eventual kernel crash
> >
> > > On Feb 28, 2017, at 5:57 PM, Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jens,
> > >
> > > With your commit 2af8cbe30531eca73c8f3ba277f155fc0020b01a in
> > > linux-block git tree, There are two requests tables. Static and dynamic of
> > same size.
> > > However function blk_mq_tag_to_rq() always try to get the tag from the
> > dynamic table which doesn't seem to be always initialized.
> > >
> > > I am running nvme-rdma initiator and it fails to find the request for the
> > given tag when command completes.
> > > Command triggers error recovery with "tag not found" error.
> > > Eventually kernel is crashing in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() with NULL
> > pointer. Seems to be additional bug in error recovery.
> > >
> > > To debug, I added initializing dynamic tags as well.
> > >
> > > blk_mq_alloc_rqs() {
> > > tags->static_rqs[i] = rq;
> > > + tags->rqs[i] = rq;
> > >
> > > This appears to resolve the issue. But that's not the fix.
> > > It appears to me that nvme stack is broken in certain conditions with recent
> > static and dynamic rq tables change.
> >
> > Can you try my for-linus branch?
>
> I tried for-linus branch and it works.
>
> Seems like ac6e0c2d633ab0411810fe6b15a40808309041db fixes it.
> __blk_mq_alloc_request()
> data->hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] = rq;
>
> Commit says no functional difference but it is actually fixing this issue.
>
> Parav
The fix is actually this one:
commit f867f4804d55adeef42c68c89edad49cdf3058f7
Author: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Date: Mon Feb 27 10:28:27 2017 -0800
blk-mq: make blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() allocate a scheduler request
blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() allocates a driver request directly, unlike
its blk_mq_alloc_request() counterpart. It also crashes because it
doesn't update the tags->rqs map.
Fix it by making it allocate a scheduler request.
Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Tested-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
The commit you pointed out would have also fixed it, but after this
change it's a no-op.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-01 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-01 0:57 connect cmd error for nvme-rdma with eventual kernel crash Parav Pandit
2017-03-01 1:26 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-01 4:55 ` Parav Pandit
2017-03-01 5:50 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2017-03-01 15:06 ` Parav Pandit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170301055045.GA27251@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=parav@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox