Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq-sched: don't hold queue_lock when calling exit_icq
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:53:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302205322.GB7792@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75978d1d-8022-75c2-7799-aa65132fdcdd@fb.com>

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:13:30AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I was worried about that. How about the below? We need to grab the lock
> at some point for legacy scheduling, but the ordering should be correct.

Makes sense, now the locking is consistent with the other place we call
ioc_exit_icq(). One nit below, and you can add

Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>

> diff --git a/block/blk-ioc.c b/block/blk-ioc.c
> index b12f9c87b4c3..6fd633b5d567 100644
> --- a/block/blk-ioc.c
> +++ b/block/blk-ioc.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void ioc_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq)
>  	icq->flags |= ICQ_EXITED;
>  }
>  
> -/* Release an icq.  Called with both ioc and q locked. */
> +/* Release an icq.  Called with ioc locked. */

For ioc_exit_icq(), we have the more explicit comment

/*
 * Exit an icq. Called with both ioc and q locked for sq, only ioc locked for
 * mq.
 */

Could you document that here, too?

>  static void ioc_destroy_icq(struct io_cq *icq)
>  {
>  	struct io_context *ioc = icq->ioc;
> @@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ static void ioc_destroy_icq(struct io_cq *icq)
>  	struct elevator_type *et = q->elevator->type;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&ioc->lock);
> -	lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
>  
>  	radix_tree_delete(&ioc->icq_tree, icq->q->id);
>  	hlist_del_init(&icq->ioc_node);
> @@ -222,24 +221,40 @@ void exit_io_context(struct task_struct *task)
>  	put_io_context_active(ioc);
>  }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-02 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10 18:32 [PATCH] blk-mq-sched: don't hold queue_lock when calling exit_icq Omar Sandoval
2017-02-10 18:35 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-15 17:24 ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-15 17:58   ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-15 18:04     ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-16 10:31       ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-17 10:30         ` Paolo Valente
2017-02-22 21:21           ` Paolo Valente
2017-03-02 10:28       ` Paolo Valente
2017-03-02 15:00         ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-02 15:13           ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-02 16:07             ` Paolo Valente
2017-03-02 16:13               ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-02 18:07                 ` Paolo Valente
2017-03-02 18:25                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-02 20:31                     ` Paolo Valente
2017-03-02 20:53                 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2017-03-02 20:59                   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170302205322.GB7792@vader \
    --to=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox