From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:49808 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751151AbdDDHKg (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-block@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 03:10:36 -0400
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 00:10:33 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: Add PF_LESS_THROTTLE to block/loop device thread.
Message-ID: <20170404071033.GA25855@infradead.org>
References: <871staffus.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <871staffus.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org

Looks fine,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

But if you actually care about performance in any way I'd suggest
to use the loop device in direct I/O mode..