public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:16:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170407181654.27836-2-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170407181654.27836-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>

Since the next patch in this series will use RCU to iterate over
tag_list, make this safe. Add lockdep_assert_held() statements
in functions that iterate over tag_list to make clear that using
list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each_entry_rcu() is
fine in these functions.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index f7cd3208bcdf..c26464f9649a 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2076,6 +2076,8 @@ static void blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, bool shared)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&set->tag_list_lock);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
 		blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
 		queue_set_hctx_shared(q, shared);
@@ -2088,7 +2090,8 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
 	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
 
 	mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
-	list_del_init(&q->tag_set_list);
+	list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list);
 	if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) {
 		/* just transitioned to unshared */
 		set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
@@ -2096,6 +2099,8 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
 		blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
+
+	synchronize_rcu();
 }
 
 static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
@@ -2113,7 +2118,7 @@ static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
 	}
 	if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)
 		queue_set_hctx_shared(q, true);
-	list_add_tail(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list);
+	list_add_tail_rcu(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
 }
@@ -2601,6 +2606,8 @@ void blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int nr_hw_queues)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&set->tag_list_lock);
+
 	if (nr_hw_queues > nr_cpu_ids)
 		nr_hw_queues = nr_cpu_ids;
 	if (nr_hw_queues < 1 || nr_hw_queues == set->nr_hw_queues)
-- 
2.12.0

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-07 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-07 18:16 [PATCH v4 0/6] Avoid that scsi-mq and dm-mq queue processing stalls sporadically Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-10  7:10   ` [PATCH v4 1/6] blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] blk-mq: Restart a single queue if tag sets are shared Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10  7:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] blk-mq: Clarify comments in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10  7:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10  7:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 15:02     ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: Avoid that SCSI queues get stuck Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10  7:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 16:09   ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 16:26     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 17:47       ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 17:51         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 18:03           ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 18:18             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-12  3:42               ` Ming Lei
2017-04-12 18:38                 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13  2:20                   ` Ming Lei
2017-04-13 16:59                     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-14  1:13                       ` Ming Lei
2017-04-14 17:12                         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-16 10:21                           ` Ming Lei
2017-04-07 18:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Avoid that scsi-mq and dm-mq queue " Jens Axboe
2017-04-07 18:33   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:39     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:51       ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-12 10:55 ` Benjamin Block
2017-04-12 18:11   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 12:23     ` Benjamin Block

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170407181654.27836-2-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox