From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:16:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170407181654.27836-2-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170407181654.27836-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Since the next patch in this series will use RCU to iterate over
tag_list, make this safe. Add lockdep_assert_held() statements
in functions that iterate over tag_list to make clear that using
list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each_entry_rcu() is
fine in these functions.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index f7cd3208bcdf..c26464f9649a 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2076,6 +2076,8 @@ static void blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, bool shared)
{
struct request_queue *q;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&set->tag_list_lock);
+
list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
queue_set_hctx_shared(q, shared);
@@ -2088,7 +2090,8 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
- list_del_init(&q->tag_set_list);
+ list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list);
if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) {
/* just transitioned to unshared */
set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
@@ -2096,6 +2099,8 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false);
}
mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
+
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
@@ -2113,7 +2118,7 @@ static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
}
if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)
queue_set_hctx_shared(q, true);
- list_add_tail(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list);
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list);
mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
}
@@ -2601,6 +2606,8 @@ void blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int nr_hw_queues)
{
struct request_queue *q;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&set->tag_list_lock);
+
if (nr_hw_queues > nr_cpu_ids)
nr_hw_queues = nr_cpu_ids;
if (nr_hw_queues < 1 || nr_hw_queues == set->nr_hw_queues)
--
2.12.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-07 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-07 18:16 [PATCH v4 0/6] Avoid that scsi-mq and dm-mq queue processing stalls sporadically Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-10 7:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] blk-mq: Restart a single queue if tag sets are shared Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] blk-mq: Clarify comments in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: Avoid that SCSI queues get stuck Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 16:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 16:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 17:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 17:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 18:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 18:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-12 3:42 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-12 18:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 2:20 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-13 16:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-14 1:13 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-14 17:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-16 10:21 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-07 18:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Avoid that scsi-mq and dm-mq queue " Jens Axboe
2017-04-07 18:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:51 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-12 10:55 ` Benjamin Block
2017-04-12 18:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 12:23 ` Benjamin Block
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170407181654.27836-2-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox