From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Matias Bjørling" <m@bjorling.me>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] block: Optimize ioprio_best()
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:10:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418231037.3968-6-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418231037.3968-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Since ioprio_best() translates IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE into IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
and since lower numerical priority values represent a higher priority
a simple numerical comparison is sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Matias Bjørling <m@bjorling.me>
---
block/ioprio.c | 12 +-----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/ioprio.c b/block/ioprio.c
index 0c47a00f92a8..4b120c9cf7e8 100644
--- a/block/ioprio.c
+++ b/block/ioprio.c
@@ -163,22 +163,12 @@ static int get_task_ioprio(struct task_struct *p)
int ioprio_best(unsigned short aprio, unsigned short bprio)
{
- unsigned short aclass;
- unsigned short bclass;
-
if (!ioprio_valid(aprio))
aprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(IOPRIO_CLASS_BE, IOPRIO_NORM);
if (!ioprio_valid(bprio))
bprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(IOPRIO_CLASS_BE, IOPRIO_NORM);
- aclass = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(aprio);
- bclass = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bprio);
- if (aclass == bclass)
- return min(aprio, bprio);
- if (aclass > bclass)
- return bprio;
- else
- return aprio;
+ return min(aprio, bprio);
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(ioprio_get, int, which, int, who)
--
2.12.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 23:10 [PATCH 0/5] Reduce code duplication Bart Van Assche
2017-04-18 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: Export blk_init_request_from_bio() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-19 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-18 23:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] null_blk: Use blk_init_request_from_bio() instead of open-coding it Bart Van Assche
2017-04-19 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-18 23:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] lightnvm: " Bart Van Assche
2017-04-19 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-18 23:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: Inline blk_rq_set_prio() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-19 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-19 14:38 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-19 15:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-18 23:10 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-19 6:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] block: Optimize ioprio_best() Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170418231037.3968-6-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@bjorling.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox