public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 09:46:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170503164631.GA10775@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170428151539.25514-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:15:36PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> When blk-mq I/O scheduler is used, we need two tags for
> submitting one request. One is called scheduler tag for
> allocating request and scheduling I/O, another one is called
> driver tag, which is used for dispatching IO to hardware/driver.
> This way introduces one extra per-queue allocation for both tags
> and request pool, and may not be as efficient as case of none
> scheduler.
> 
> Also currently we put a default per-hctx limit on schedulable
> requests, and this limit may be a bottleneck for some devices,
> especialy when these devices have a quite big tag space.
> 
> This patch introduces BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG so that we can
> allow to use hardware/driver tags directly for IO scheduling if
> devices's hardware tag space is big enough. Then we can avoid
> the extra resource allocation and make IO submission more
> efficient.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq-sched.c   | 10 +++++++++-
>  block/blk-mq.c         | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

One more note on this: if we're using the hardware tags directly, then
we are no longer limited to q->nr_requests requests in-flight. Instead,
we're limited to the hw queue depth. We probably want to maintain the
original behavior, so I think we need to resize the hw tags in
blk_mq_init_sched() if we're using hardware tags.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-03 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-28 15:15 [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: support to use hw tag for scheduling Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:21   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:46   ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2017-05-03 20:13     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 21:40       ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-04  2:01         ` Ming Lei
2017-05-04  2:13           ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-04  2:51             ` Ming Lei
2017-05-04 14:06               ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-05 22:54                 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-05 23:33                   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-10  7:25                 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_get_queue_depth() Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:23   ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-29  9:55     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:55   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-04  2:10     ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: use hw tag for scheduling if hw tag space is big enough Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:09   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-29 10:35     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-01 15:06       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-02  3:49         ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-02  8:46         ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:22   ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 20:11     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-29 10:59     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:29   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:55     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:00       ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 17:33         ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: dump new introduced flag of BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:10   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-29 11:00     ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 20:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: support to use hw tag for scheduling Jens Axboe
2017-05-03  4:03   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 14:08     ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 14:10       ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 15:03         ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 15:08           ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 15:38             ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:06               ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:21                 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:52               ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:03                 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:07                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:15                     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:24                       ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:35                         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:40                           ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:43                             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:08                 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:11                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:19                   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:41                     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170503164631.GA10775@vader \
    --to=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox