From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 08:44:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170526004422.GA22365@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdfae246-d65e-fc49-69ec-dffe63832605@fb.com>
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:42:59AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 05/25/2017 11:24 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 17:09 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> Another big issue is that 'srcu_struct' is very big, which shouldn't
> >> be embedded into hctx, since we only have one real user of
> >> BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING.
> >>
> >> So I will fix that too.
> >
> > Hello Ming,
> >
> > Is something like the (untested) patch below perhaps what you had in mind?
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: Reduce blk_mq_hw_ctx size
> >
> > Since the srcu structure is rather large (184 bytes on an x86-64
> > system), only allocate it if needed.
> >
> > Reported-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/blk-mq.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/blk-mq.h | 5 +++--
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> > index 1e330de4e3c5..15b7d4077638 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > @@ -2233,6 +2233,17 @@ struct request_queue *blk_mq_init_queue(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_init_queue);
> >
> > +static int blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(struct request_queue *q)
> > +{
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(ALIGN(offsetof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, queue_rq_srcu) +
> > + sizeof(((struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *)NULL)->queue_rq_srcu), 64) !=
> > + sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx));
> > +
> > + return q->tag_set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING ?
> > + sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx) :
> > + offsetof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, queue_rq_srcu);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> > struct request_queue *q)
> > {
> > @@ -2247,7 +2258,7 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> > continue;
> >
> > node = blk_mq_hw_queue_to_node(q->mq_map, i);
> > - hctxs[i] = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx),
> > + hctxs[i] = kzalloc_node(blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(q),
> > GFP_KERNEL, node);
> > if (!hctxs[i])
> > break;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> > index c0d59330b5e0..8467e1f83524 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> > @@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
> > struct blk_mq_tags *tags;
> > struct blk_mq_tags *sched_tags;
> >
> > - struct srcu_struct queue_rq_srcu;
> > -
> > unsigned long queued;
> > unsigned long run;
> > #define BLK_MQ_MAX_DISPATCH_ORDER 7
> > @@ -62,6 +60,9 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
> > struct dentry *debugfs_dir;
> > struct dentry *sched_debugfs_dir;
> > #endif
> > +
> > + /* Must be the last member - see also blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(). */
> > + struct srcu_struct queue_rq_srcu;
> > };
>
> Why not make it
>
> /* Must be the last member - see also blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(). */
> struct srcu_struct queue_rq_srcu[0];
Yeah, actually that was what I did yesterday in my local tree, will
posted out today with the blk_mq_quiesce_queue() fix.
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-26 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-25 4:21 [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing Ming Lei
2017-05-25 4:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_unquiesce_queue Ming Lei
2017-05-25 4:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: introduce flag of QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED Ming Lei
2017-05-25 4:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm: use the introduced blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() Ming Lei
2017-05-25 4:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] nvme: " Ming Lei
2017-05-25 4:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi: " Ming Lei
2017-05-25 4:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: quiesce queue via percpu_ref Ming Lei
2017-05-25 4:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: update comments on blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Ming Lei
2017-05-25 5:24 ` [PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: fix queue quiescing Bart Van Assche
2017-05-25 9:09 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-25 17:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-25 17:31 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-25 17:42 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-25 17:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-26 0:44 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170526004422.GA22365@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox