From: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: fix hang in remove path
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:47:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170605084732.GA30881@dhcp-216.srv.tuxera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170605084434.GA30864@dhcp-216.srv.tuxera.com>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:44:34AM +0300, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 06:24:09PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >
> > > It would make sense to still add:
> > >
> > > if (ctrl->state == NVME_CTRL_DELETING || ctrl->state == NVME_CTRL_DEAD)
> > > return
> > >
> > > inside nvme_configure_apst at the top irrespective of this change.
> >
> > I'm not sure what is the value given that it is taken care of in
> > .queue_rq?
>
> We would avoid getting error message which says: "failed to set APST
> feature 7". Why an error if controller is already under reset.
I meant deletion. Of course not a huge value but worth a fix IMHO
while we are at it.
>
> Note 7 here is NVME_SC_ABORT_REQ. Also we would avoid walking through
> all power states inside the nvme_configure_apst as
> nvme_set_latency_tolerance was called with value
> PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE_NO_CONSTRAINT (-1) which sets
> ctrl->ps_max_latency_us to U64_MAX and tries to send a sync command
> which of course fails with error message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-05 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-02 8:32 [PATCH] nvme: fix hang in remove path Ming Lei
2017-06-02 13:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-06-02 18:04 ` Rakesh Pandit
2017-06-04 15:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-06-05 8:44 ` Rakesh Pandit
2017-06-05 8:47 ` Rakesh Pandit [this message]
2017-06-05 19:45 ` Rakesh Pandit
2017-06-06 7:10 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-06-06 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-06 7:30 ` Rakesh Pandit
2017-06-05 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170605084732.GA30881@dhcp-216.srv.tuxera.com \
--to=rakesh@tuxera.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).