From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59026 "EHLO mx1.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750859AbdFUNSb (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-block@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:18:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:17:23 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use new block error code
Message-ID: <20170621131723.GH21388@twin.jikos.cz>
Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz
References: <20170619105536.GA24075@elgon.mountain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20170619105536.GA24075@elgon.mountain>
Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:55:37PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is supposed to return blk_status_t error codes now but
> there was a stray -ENOMEM left behind.
> 
> Fixes: 4e4cbee93d56 ("block: switch bios to blk_status_t")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The patch depends on the blk_status_t patchset, so I expect that it's
going to be merged to that.