From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: NVMe induced NULL deref in bt_iter()
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 20:03:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170703120348.GB28651@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc6e2ecf-031b-45c0-8fbb-98c12c790ee4@grimberg.me>
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:07:44PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> > Yeah, the above change is correct, for any canceling requests in this
> > way we should use blk_mq_quiesce_queue().
>
> I still don't understand why should blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs hit a NULL
> deref if we don't touch the tagset...
Looks no one mentioned the steps for reproduction, then it isn't easy
to understand the related use case, could anyone share the steps for
reproduction?
>
> Also, I'm wandering in what case we shouldn't use
> blk_mq_quiesce_queue()? Maybe we should unexport blk_mq_stop_hw_queues()
> and blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues() and use the quiesce/unquiesce
> equivalent always?
There are at least one case in which we have to use stop queues:
- when QUEUE_BUSY(now it becomes BLK_STS_RESOURCE) happens, some drivers
need to stop queues for avoiding to hurt CPU, such as virtio-blk, ...
>
> The only fishy usage is in nvme_fc_start_fcp_op() where if submission
> failed the code stop the hw queues and delays it, but I think it should
> be handled differently..
It looks like the old way of scsi-mq, but scsi has removed this way and
avoids to stop queue.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 17:26 NVMe induced NULL deref in bt_iter() Jens Axboe
2017-07-02 10:45 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-07-02 11:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-02 14:37 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-07-02 15:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-03 9:40 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-03 10:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-03 12:03 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-07-03 12:46 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-07-03 15:54 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-04 6:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-04 7:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-04 8:08 ` Ming Lei
2017-07-04 9:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-03 16:01 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170703120348.GB28651@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox