From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] md: raid1 nowait support
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:39:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808203907.obfzlkqe4zboipva@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170726235806.12148-4-rgoldwyn@suse.de>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:58:00PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>
> The RAID1 driver would bail with EAGAIN in case of:
> + I/O has to wait for a barrier
> + array is frozen
> + Area is suspended
> + There are too many pending I/O that it will be queued.
>
> To facilitate error for wait barriers, wait_barrier() is
> returning bool. True in case if there was a wait (or is not
> required). False in case a wait was required, but was not performed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid1.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index 3febfc8391fb..66ca4288e3e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -903,8 +903,9 @@ static void lower_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
> wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
> }
>
> -static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
> +static bool _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx, bool nowait)
> {
> + bool ret = true;
> /*
> * We need to increase conf->nr_pending[idx] very early here,
> * then raise_barrier() can be blocked when it waits for
> @@ -935,7 +936,7 @@ static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
> */
> if (!READ_ONCE(conf->array_frozen) &&
> !atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]))
> - return;
> + return ret;
>
> /*
> * After holding conf->resync_lock, conf->nr_pending[idx]
> @@ -953,18 +954,26 @@ static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
> */
> wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
> /* Wait for the barrier in same barrier unit bucket to drop. */
> - wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> - !conf->array_frozen &&
> - !atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]),
> - conf->resync_lock);
> + if (conf->array_frozen || atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx])) {
> + if (nowait)
> + ret = false;
In this case, we nr_pending shouldn't be increased
> + else
> + wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> + !conf->array_frozen &&
> + !atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]),
> + conf->resync_lock);
> + }
> atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);
> atomic_dec(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> -static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
> +static bool wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr,
> + bool nowait)
> {
> int idx = sector_to_idx(sector_nr);
> + bool ret = true;
>
> /*
> * Very similar to _wait_barrier(). The difference is, for read
> @@ -976,7 +985,7 @@ static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
> atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);
>
> if (!READ_ONCE(conf->array_frozen))
> - return;
> + return ret;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
> atomic_inc(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
> @@ -987,19 +996,28 @@ static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
> */
> wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
> /* Wait for array to be unfrozen */
> - wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> - !conf->array_frozen,
> - conf->resync_lock);
> + if (conf->array_frozen) {
> + /* If nowait flag is set, return false to
> + * show we did not wait
> + */
> + if (nowait)
> + ret = false;
ditto
> + else
> + wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> + !conf->array_frozen,
> + conf->resync_lock);
> + }
> atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);
> atomic_dec(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> -static void wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
> +static bool wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr, bool nowait)
> {
> int idx = sector_to_idx(sector_nr);
>
> - _wait_barrier(conf, idx);
> + return _wait_barrier(conf, idx, nowait);
> }
>
> static void wait_all_barriers(struct r1conf *conf)
> @@ -1007,7 +1025,7 @@ static void wait_all_barriers(struct r1conf *conf)
> int idx;
>
> for (idx = 0; idx < BARRIER_BUCKETS_NR; idx++)
> - _wait_barrier(conf, idx);
> + _wait_barrier(conf, idx, false);
> }
>
> static void _allow_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
> @@ -1223,7 +1241,11 @@ static void raid1_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> * Still need barrier for READ in case that whole
> * array is frozen.
> */
> - wait_read_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> + if (!wait_read_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> + bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)) {
> + bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (!r1_bio)
> r1_bio = alloc_r1bio(mddev, bio);
> @@ -1333,6 +1355,11 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> * an interruptible wait.
> */
> DEFINE_WAIT(w);
> + if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> + bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> for (;;) {
> sigset_t full, old;
> prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_barrier,
> @@ -1351,7 +1378,11 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> }
> finish_wait(&conf->wait_barrier, &w);
> }
> - wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> + if (!wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> + bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)) {
> + bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> + return;
> + }
>
> r1_bio = alloc_r1bio(mddev, bio);
> r1_bio->sectors = max_write_sectors;
> @@ -1359,6 +1390,10 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> if (conf->pending_count >= max_queued_requests) {
> md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> raid1_log(mddev, "wait queued");
> + if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> + bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> + return;
> + }
> wait_event(conf->wait_barrier,
> conf->pending_count < max_queued_requests);
> }
> @@ -1442,6 +1477,11 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> /* Wait for this device to become unblocked */
> int j;
>
> + if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> + bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
> if (r1_bio->bios[j])
> rdev_dec_pending(conf->mirrors[j].rdev, mddev);
> @@ -1449,7 +1489,7 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> allow_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> raid1_log(mddev, "wait rdev %d blocked", blocked_rdev->raid_disk);
> md_wait_for_blocked_rdev(blocked_rdev, mddev);
> - wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> + wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, false);
There are other cases we could block, for example, md_wait_for_blocked_rdev
here. Is the goal just avoid block for normal situations?
> goto retry_write;
> }
>
> --
> 2.12.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 23:57 [PATCH 0/9] Nowait feature for stacked block devices Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:57 ` [PATCH 1/9] QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT to indicate device supports nowait Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:32 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-08 20:36 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 2:18 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 11:38 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 14:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 17:15 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 17:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-09 11:44 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-09 15:02 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-09 15:35 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-09 20:21 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-09 22:16 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 1:17 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-10 2:07 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 2:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 11:49 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 14:25 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-10 14:28 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 17:15 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 17:20 ` Jens Axboe
2017-07-26 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] md: Add nowait support to md Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:34 ` Shaohua Li
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] md: raid1 nowait support Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:39 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2017-08-09 11:45 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] md: raid5 " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:43 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-09 11:45 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] md: raid10 " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:40 ` Shaohua Li
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 6/9] dm: add " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] dm: Add nowait support to raid1 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] dm: Add nowait support to dm-delay Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] dm-mpath: Add nowait support Goldwyn Rodrigues
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-04 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/9] Nowait support for stacked block devices Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/9] md: raid1 nowait support Goldwyn Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170808203907.obfzlkqe4zboipva@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox