From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:47200 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751391AbdHJJQ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 05:16:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:16:26 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Cc: Hannes Reinecke , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, vnarasimhan@in.ibm.com, Mauricio pIO , Brian J King , Murali N Iyer Subject: Re: nvmf question - synchronization between target/initiator regarding partitions Message-ID: <20170810091626.GA21958@infradead.org> References: <82c4d1d8-ffa9-fa99-df58-05e2945eafdc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4c199e9e-ed58-5a5b-cedc-2d3c3bc1464c@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4c199e9e-ed58-5a5b-cedc-2d3c3bc1464c@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:29:47PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > Thanks for your feedback Hannes, agreed! And btw, you'll see similar results with the SCSI target or nbd, so it's not really nvme specific.